Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94449
Return-Path: <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 14169 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2016 09:36:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jul 2016 09:36:56 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.22 mout.gmx.net  
Received: from [212.227.17.22] ([212.227.17.22:62778] helo=mout.gmx.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id B3/1C-18622-6B5C0875 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 05:36:55 -0400
Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([217.82.227.154]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNO33-1bSiRX2Qa9-006sK4; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 11:36:50
 +0200
To: Leigh <leight@gmail.com>, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
References: <CAPwsocEihGOWC5_KX_FFe36dKTdSob0FFJUKuQW+u53QyeqgsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU7AzLGbFh+=bvJNA+HScLVuKsUuF9iUEhACL6xv7VRZ-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPwsocF0Zty7Kp1FZHYA2h+Y+eJvypj9nt1OPa8fdEZdiqR8vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU48mLGqVVh4sDguto4Vx9Kj+ec=ViTUWXOr-UXCgSt2KA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU6XUGM4BfQ5g+huV_=rrVPfFtpmSO+3CzTcXPC20+x2=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPwsocE5v7mGt3frjoPeFyt6sWtvkjWb=zcPUhFuRLA8fXLY2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <b5e33d93-c815-5d45-4e71-f6fa3270004f@gmx.de>
 <CAPwsocGtzyB-J68ntnjRB9GRWN_2tCg8R5gMc2t6dfhaBv8PTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <566e5306-7460-1615-303a-5037869890b2@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 11:36:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPwsocGtzyB-J68ntnjRB9GRWN_2tCg8R5gMc2t6dfhaBv8PTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ySd4gSNYWCS6D9zJ31tjuJuyAKhNnn3+JMfT6Ppkql/YOQtEOF4
 aLL89X+2HMAJ72PJ4lqzzHR8i+hpvIbdKbayRo9SEU3miSgj32lDKR2ISmFY3DYt1q0JDL7
 7AsCS5fn/bjPK+1UnMBEzep0XwGYqUOSo9j7tgnydS2Bq75Y9DUHhWlmWoQY9/spZAO3E8L
 HmkS5PgtqUz78NH/XDLPQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:O3vNt3/PgvU=:BtZ7t3qgRdxTFTfzK8TZeD
 e3N8ylpzOhQ0BGImxlQywsUgQAwtTY5AvmphoI4BQ7u76dgHGuDuNz+wzYT0R8zFcjetcpKhw
 NZywSBqujrvpDu/0dis7lwXRl+mjIqoBUBi/lex+rRQ52eMAE2LeQ4Knseutp4Io31UcQDF8q
 s0/OSRoUaCVR4K5Ie/WHTer3/1rzjX2yIZxAdEWm0dp3WTacKeNHUKcRgIwXBIdzpDH18uIst
 n4/m9bnf6KOQDZKmL9eYBH2qH0D0jlXP3EM4iFI4WJUOjgcLgC7Nsan+Ori+Wm9uYsHwL0FUo
 FtG5q6W6dSW7p/SWBjFoXV+ZhywWij3/MscmoLmUI26U/f5hNwmqWtX4CRmERD2TTBIPFn/O+
 Ph1cswjtXOYcJIEfCXLqZKmsLDotQfuf7lOZ6WFnIUqlBVTOjYS3XdaktgOnrxrMyZb18+TCG
 e9XebgAMuhPbqBSVejTYJL8MsQdYY8KiehbPgDDbtmXS3+DkNb9T4LGbovUTJqd5KtHhQDa9V
 zr46SfXcndgAFnoL/ZIcUPoD//zkZkw0BkP0/UN3yy4F4bv0/cuzkQ96UscXsJCfoigfFKtfO
 nKZzuKz8QzvJ64wfc6qptNYsqgBS3bpN9ZWARKyjgaQrhqtdX1dnGylZuNpIoEyxL/65PLSKc
 WdNBFqmhRZG4TxDWklnGdScKvAyEdpTu6gGXuP0kbVM2Yy6/7WygQ8aTqqlARJ7XEcFsOSSCH
 GaUxk9bYKABN5M5FCu41SqvqN4ePknABs7ST03oA0jhODAreLJxOpdh30M1w06YCcwqZDjTB1
 53w/jRd
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] RNG fixes
From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker)

On 09.07.2016 at 11:18, Leigh wrote:

> On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 at 10:16 Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> Assuming that "Make array_rand() more efficient" is indeed only about
>> performance (and not about fixes for the broken implementation), it
>> wouldn't be a bug fix, but as array_rand()'s behavior would change
>> anyway as noted by the RFC, it makes sense to do it as well.
>>
>> Possibly badly worded by me. It makes the output of array_rand less
>> biased.

Thanks for the clarification.  In this case I consider it a bug fix, as
array_rand() is *seriously* broken on Windows.

-- 
Christoph M. Becker