Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94447 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10982 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2016 09:18:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jul 2016 09:18:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.54 mail-lf0-f54.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.54] ([209.85.215.54:35632] helo=mail-lf0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 84/6B-18622-A61C0875 for ; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 05:18:35 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l188so41502223lfe.2 for ; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 02:18:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UkYzAFWrLXx7ULTRkE6uJNXHkn688uizTsa2uhaJga0=; b=B0xliI4kVUIKaNDH0pmsMQklmZJ90TjXhu8rVyXMQ5CryJvpcLBEm+BqreMsUqNCD7 HDeuP0z6VwX4HhGS8BTkvIgei8yWZhncHetQBXYa9wUsqd7ZDqjKvH7LIljIkQmTCaWi BWKRkq2KbOYMaQJPMH8Grg4vdA9s0BT67ggsbnNXLUw6dgaW7jZQwobK/4k0bhartHtU +7cG/W5el/N6dL6kCebpMT1kZuBWs/Gux6xk+fJBxkTDgo4bo4Nm18C6alZQh5Uw7BM7 3v+ECoWCnpHkwVyRi7xWq+fSjdMi0qqoUZWSrQ2Sno/DDIgUMSaeNNMglRu0LRyriWD2 bJEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UkYzAFWrLXx7ULTRkE6uJNXHkn688uizTsa2uhaJga0=; b=cBa/9y9pxcC6AJwFAN6JpcAXc1QKDS4HegzZKPVlk2e3vFP1bm02EqJ28sghLsdvZ7 tIxlUOl5t2xgHhqhFNO3IRZWcXfajrx/FeVaerQRt3UWxWJCO47QG41sOc2QnLLkYlYb pMcrcCOz64FfePUsM1Ky6elG/bZfATjT/bDEaqYhv227T5PaWZR07GXzyAbU4AHrFYkH ZVPTKFAVnILuAa+VXPvYjJWMrUhPJxSmdce0/DFK5s+rilcqhw3Czd7KyIXZ3kQXar8t IAczRZg6idNrsVISAw0tgT/gJ8SWC37ygQx8TJ3kI30Gf5UB1eG0kpnjC0Nr+LOcEAt0 cjKw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLXlROcgZ1WUHDD6qx0NtCaYSY47+rCCzyQJIuNLUFB4YWdNrTslP3nHsOr7EhlUugYnQ6Ak0wSrXnNhA== X-Received: by 10.46.33.13 with SMTP id h13mr1550074ljh.41.1468055911658; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 02:18:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 09:18:22 +0000 Message-ID: To: Christoph Becker , Pierre Joye Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142b4c01ff9720537306770 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] RNG fixes From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh) --001a1142b4c01ff9720537306770 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 at 10:16 Christoph Becker wrote: > > Assuming that "Make array_rand() more efficient" is indeed only about > performance (and not about fixes for the broken implementation), it > wouldn't be a bug fix, but as array_rand()'s behavior would change > anyway as noted by the RFC, it makes sense to do it as well. > > Possibly badly worded by me. It makes the output of array_rand less biased. --001a1142b4c01ff9720537306770--