Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94341 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93664 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2016 20:23:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jun 2016 20:23:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.220.169 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.169 mail-qk0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.169] ([209.85.220.169:32895] helo=mail-qk0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 73/66-14264-ADF75775 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:23:55 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id o76so53953654qke.0 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:23:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lF+8eP1RFjao9hEUPwhCtkUT3Sxh9LicXF5vYwrIYEA=; b=ck1q7wL3qUwn721QQWRhjKCrlGqLrWnc+9SchXqMHl23Ea7OX7QekdrF3FHr6d4fDu gLf4HEeVXxj2udBpDaQYTx1SnoKsNIdOwompN3llmZKSvTlmU9UDZjAXb1CEEGMPGr0K hIaVD+IaqW5FCRg0pk8l3ZpMgYmO2cXuVuZaXBwSU7n9Q6Ak/yx6TjtKmFibJH6sk8/r PzzG4jsg+l+oyEYyMA+J1xkuCIKGzDnc1p/0dpU/9uZsWME8Y+ws65AJiCBwMqsinMc1 KwVDRRiEemC+WBFSBgqC5T4zCISOWdpCtXOL+O+LrORpaY3pUg0LBwKLcOgLeL78SNDT dC4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lF+8eP1RFjao9hEUPwhCtkUT3Sxh9LicXF5vYwrIYEA=; b=JXcxNtHs17rwZiGY4Bd+z20n0y+5gbixaG/iARnXIVc4H8HoEG9ApduoyxiqXJIICS 9oYRmXCbQLt9tnRz/ItZLF+ykZgaMHcBp0R+u+wruvBhzxzLqVtbe8Y8mSXu18v1JHjU K/IpwTOnVGCgwwf3KesnDhdl75lrGKprRH8a1ZY18i+zZSV7eGyRs/UV0Ds2//9jzbiU 62/K3oW0KZo3HtlcG316xczlfoJsb9aBylr4IQWLRVGg21B5xwb3cBzaHqXrP4XENHkv YAXG99RmUcDXGQEa+csOgLyAMKgy3h0C6TTjtEcV7iTmM6CPwkRK8Koan+8LYLonrS85 8ZLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI0K/wfOGnnYdZ5Dst5Cg+CkXghhW0+iWu58nRGa6BrPTMByNt0SAN5sFNy6TK4fNZZ+dGZJSc39laltQ== X-Received: by 10.13.240.194 with SMTP id z185mr8150544ywe.317.1467318231535; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:23:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.207.139 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:23:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [78.148.157.176] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 21:23:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: PHP internals , Aaron Piotrowski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote] Throw Error in Extensions From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On 30 June 2016 at 01:32, Pierre Joye wrote: >> It's not a language change, so doesn't seem to meet the criteria for >> needing a 2/3 pass rate. > > It is changing the core like ext/standard and other core functions. That's true, but doesn't appear to be the required test. From the Voting RFC: > a feature affecting the language itself (new syntax for example) will be considered as 'accepted' > if it wins a 2/3 of the votes. Other RFCs require 50% + 1 votes to get 'accepted'. Although the core functions ship as PHP they aren't part of the language, so 50% + 1 seems to appropriate. cheers Dan