Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94262 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 3744 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2016 17:19:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Jun 2016 17:19:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@fleshgrinder.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@fleshgrinder.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fleshgrinder.com from 77.244.243.89 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@fleshgrinder.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 77.244.243.89 mx108.easyname.com Received: from [77.244.243.89] ([77.244.243.89:34208] helo=mx204.easyname.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D6/11-27012-B9E00775 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:19:25 -0400 Received: from cable-81-173-134-219.netcologne.de ([81.173.134.219] helo=[192.168.178.20]) by mx.easyname.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHDiK-000183-Fj for internals@lists.php.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:19:20 +0000 Reply-To: internals@lists.php.net To: php-internals Message-ID: <28e5ac75-0d94-a111-f702-f9594e7e7a14@fleshgrinder.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:19:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TEf5MeFxaCbbKOicmAjeeva8FjtVH1sn7" X-ACL-Warn: X-DNSBL-BARRACUDACENTRAL Subject: [RFC DISCUSSION] var_info From: php@fleshgrinder.com (Fleshgrinder) --TEf5MeFxaCbbKOicmAjeeva8FjtVH1sn7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="AopJFGHhml8vff70VN8WuM5v8B2AbFxd3" From: Fleshgrinder Reply-To: internals@lists.php.net To: php-internals Message-ID: <28e5ac75-0d94-a111-f702-f9594e7e7a14@fleshgrinder.com> Subject: [RFC DISCUSSION] var_info --AopJFGHhml8vff70VN8WuM5v8B2AbFxd3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would like to start the discussion on the already announced var_info() function. Especially the following open issues should be addressed before going into voting: 1. Whether to output "negative zero float" for -0.0 or keep "zero float". This functionality was requested on Reddit but IEEE 754 actually says that one should ignore the difference. Detecting the negative zero would also require the signbit functionality from C99 (or weird hacking).= 2. Whether to output "invalid object" instead of "object of class __PHP_Incomplete_Class" to make it more clear cut that this object is won= ky. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/var_info --=20 Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger --AopJFGHhml8vff70VN8WuM5v8B2AbFxd3-- --TEf5MeFxaCbbKOicmAjeeva8FjtVH1sn7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXcA6UAAoJEOKkKcqFPVVrwRIP/2erCTsjRXSbFtuS/f36wzIO qQUAa3yprkf17GDbfZZugUwB/+qrAZR+J104+mS35eyv1crGQimKfU8dQWe0Rxht /I7AWHip++CeW69jtraVJJePYFiErTnDNhB9XYdjUQ6OOjWm839WPjVT08Yhe3gf 31mhDzkRTBr1vwdwkXgYH8FidTf3VEhUJH89YpPe5ggjqXPHm2aZ4gSL1OUFJoVT Ee1oeKcfqRLaZOAOKQ346Lz6bv8HvnLvd+bAroTKezWEJQCgnjf7cHgzwY4mzvbG NMQZOpVLjV6ZUIttLlkW+P7V9ueIASIWA30VCabhbxumX90ds/UnY6jdXKECSznA Asu2NyVnNnxwgMdp84BCHk6pKA2p0zEL9KldSPaWGbD270ODsaI2QIfBKbAZ9WwZ xe/6hAe6KaZ2OzkA27fOoKToi7ZCawcoX1LCtb0J9/VeCRY9K+51U9ZOClyBh/Jg ly/SGkVrE81Wj4wWf8ezqb6AjV6tFO9wwvAPHUztQzbo6YYzZJgTRYz8m3ugid1r lna2omGtwLBL+EDmxeBcubAyPf/21LEGhwrszIpyH2zUnMjeMlLuBmDZrgDXn03H ZyKOe4HsPj96MRYQHbMfoqf2PlUsMHM4sYoftgvmGhp5vJd+WiuBowMyzNvgjK5g E34DDWVlGDeMeAKfdFuY =0723 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TEf5MeFxaCbbKOicmAjeeva8FjtVH1sn7--