Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94240 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93562 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2016 21:08:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jun 2016 21:08:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain pascal-martin.fr designates 91.121.85.26 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mailing@pascal-martin.fr X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.121.85.26 ns362529.ip-91-121-85.eu Received: from [91.121.85.26] ([91.121.85.26:43953] helo=pascal-martin.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 29/33-08667-6EF4C675 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:08:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (home.squalenet.net [82.225.233.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pascal-martin.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41566E00C7 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 23:08:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <576C4FE2.3090508@pascal-martin.fr> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 23:08:50 +0200 Organization: AFUP User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote] Typed Properties From: mailing@pascal-martin.fr ("Pascal MARTIN, AFUP") Le 10/06/2016 12:38, Joe Watkins a écrit : > The vote for typed properties has been restarted. Hi, We, at AFUP, often tend to be on the "more static / strict types" side of things, and it remains this way for this RFC -- which means we would be +1 for typed properties. A few noted this was not quite "the PHP way", while the majority felt this was in line with previous changes (like scalar type declarations, nullable types...) and could prove interesting for complex applications. Judging from where the votes are right now, I'm guessing this RFC will not pass, but, in any case, thanks for your work on this! There are more "yes" than "no", so maybe it will open a path towards something, maybe a bit different, in another future version... -- Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG http://php-internals.afup.org/