Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94110
Return-Path: <danack@basereality.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 74102 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2016 23:11:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jun 2016 23:11:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.213.46 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.46 mail-vk0-f46.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.213.46] ([209.85.213.46:36325] helo=mail-vk0-f46.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 53/65-18862-F05D5675 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:11:12 -0400
Received: by mail-vk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id u64so156965743vkf.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 16:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=9UNoMKB8JrNMaL7ggqkQkBzzI7xgOfibVsiOQmf+nmg=;
        b=ydB5NmzAk5bEkcb8/jesiYEkKBHYFLsmQJA1LfpWQrMMh+bS/wSpdxpudB1LPMSa0g
         sQRz9L4jIDvcXOKAqfYlW7xqhHItFY4ETa1lxvlFkn33eY2tDAPt/CFV+CNVmoUQ5OPi
         OyaQOY8z0IE37ijNICSw9g2fM2QBCrEAe9cOJziWvwMicZ5eDCq1ZRyqFrODn8uWftds
         BFI5bxngKgLMpJenKYiIGkffJKyLlKMKesnYhQBjbAJSuGIfArczN3loGxU+sMXfAps0
         4ZxEoydhHs//ZwcHuoG1ZVLea6UP3cYnmw2OBDKwTGnii57JabTGn56f8/PKW7h7Jl8Y
         vabQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=9UNoMKB8JrNMaL7ggqkQkBzzI7xgOfibVsiOQmf+nmg=;
        b=Iv6SW98p5gBLUYKl6jYQ237f8RgjQ8TGwFxSNhQ40IhTdAfOkUiL5mHyeWFUm00fQR
         atVVvaeh0lxL9Y83m/N6+NNbxWE/49qxtwB57yLdpjbLaMfZ8yzl7tLawOPyEUd+MjHh
         zmteP6hidZdt0cfP8mSvtLuVIV+VBi4u6ox/v4pLrRqYyYCZCzPJgLRCzg6x+VVmOTDa
         MJOggp/MLATxwv49Q5C4FTPnQRx/frW1xnDt6QCI/7jDykW0i3gGLPEsHz4INFKnyDls
         iJeGkhoeutPlKsW00p3DOwA4S9fVGYqlgE+u5v5NXPcWYdzEkuAMvKs9DHnfMb/o9iUf
         d4sQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLwtflyMQF84iXI47uj0rsZqTd0rDJ11HMkYUFhEr/fvb32ql/kEdkdf08BRTVqWYcORb5gdRhNQINWlA==
X-Received: by 10.176.67.99 with SMTP id k90mr2145371uak.152.1466291469399;
 Sat, 18 Jun 2016 16:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.5.193 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 16:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [78.147.0.240]
In-Reply-To: <35132CB5-6E11-477F-8AC6-4374A7434D43@trowski.com>
References: <8284FE1F-70EE-4DB6-A945-0C57A4C99DCC@trowski.com>
 <16ef864f-8378-1af3-ddfb-21dc583a4b4a@gmx.de> <CAFMT4NrTDLhU912CQH55Y8z+M0s_qyP_FOxLKALwUcV0xB52Fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <d502f27c-869a-e46b-186d-9653f154bdf3@fleshgrinder.com> <35132CB5-6E11-477F-8AC6-4374A7434D43@trowski.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 00:11:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+kxMuRkzMqjCM+DWGb_vDPW-O1Btc5Gk=TfoQwk59cjNPUrGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Piotrowski <aaron@trowski.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Iterable
From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd)

Hi Aaron,

> does anyone have any further feedback on this proposal?

What is the performance impact of the RFC on the standard performance
benchmarks?

And can you comment on the performance of using iterable as a type for
parameters/return types, compared to normal classes?

cheers
Dan