Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94059 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83922 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2016 19:13:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2016 19:13:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.44 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.44 mail-pa0-f44.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.44] ([209.85.220.44:34853] helo=mail-pa0-f44.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 42/F8-25388-85AF2675 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:13:29 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hl6so20658828pac.2 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iIEtjgJeMd9cFRlvda7/n+U4Yq1c7IBs7RMXR6BOHtk=; b=fZYorWi/K2FRCQsrMz+0IWMqlX4bH94ZFl8MlLrU+7NI3ji+RtrQKGE2RQ5nh6Xurk OHDLdeW/tYlKO7rIIJoAa3Ou45D9tfQOcdS7vVNyIV6kDYJqEOYhYwsFog/oIAckx8jS Op91gb7yAjunI0ocwAQ1jhbiMhQVQAxLZ5Q3ZSTZSrsm1JBbwqEc8viny0xEA6BwJpAf qzHHJmdl1A+7kxX46rmGmHLFMgF/kRgBNKVy3j9Qdc4GuT8BvDn9OJ2tG1ziGNUa2a4k /0UHuEFDxNQRFeKAdulV9J8SARaWAe6apPVC5zVfM/xni+AK1/Q5jqMFxtjSPbdIR3rF VQXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iIEtjgJeMd9cFRlvda7/n+U4Yq1c7IBs7RMXR6BOHtk=; b=OM6hfy/aAndMUNUmOHLIIoA2AmceUXuvT0C1a1ktepFjNVc//f0dY6LuX4m4tlYg52 M8AFR7OKtAcfssN3uMyKn1L3jJuSlL/bWvufDqNeuVLUdQVaq+PnBYBdpBA2N+qvAMD9 y7nAPkokl1IM5PoU5XYskG5kPLxvmzHcrAkSDRAvHPkUtvRN/sP6ibLDS2vv47Orl42s TqQk9inH8R0jtmSJIh+objYOsp/NRzz+UDzoDBsJxVuAc8ynIHt68wtmiykNweB7txrg DMxGzBR7Mu9I56FEFicqEJM5ZlcKOcAUite2VAYyfwt0/UcMWOzEcbcc8NFUBve9TxRi pLBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK4epfZVKJD3i6AYMce6EkjVuLmotsqaau+DIBWqWayXJbSS1Y26JiYgIqYVK+TVQ== X-Received: by 10.66.126.11 with SMTP id mu11mr7002054pab.18.1466104405254; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stas-air.corp.wikimedia.org (tan1.corp.wikimedia.org. [198.73.209.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y10sm44240252pas.24.2016.06.16.12.13.24 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:13:24 -0700 (PDT) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <6c03dafd-093a-0087-6312-96fede93c5f0@gmail.com> <1c437efe-7f1d-629f-cfbc-41cbcda38d89@fleshgrinder.com> <1a9958a1-a01b-d188-a2db-7b7d1b90198a@fleshgrinder.com> Message-ID: <580b2ca0-efab-79ce-4f2d-c2c942fff4b3@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:13:23 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1a9958a1-a01b-d188-a2db-7b7d1b90198a@fleshgrinder.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Is the "No BC Breaks in Minor Releases" policy enforceable? From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > it into 7.0 is plain wrong and only creates problems. Everyone is always > so concerned about breaking something if someone proposes some > deprecation but in such cases nobody cares. Because it's not about how it's proposed, but is about what impact it will have on users. If you try to deprecate feature that is widely used, you'd get a lot of pushback. If you try to change something that nobody is using and nobody should be using, you'd get little to no pushback. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com