Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94055
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 75763 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2016 18:38:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2016 18:38:19 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.45 mail-lf0-f45.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.45] ([209.85.215.45:36198] helo=mail-lf0-f45.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 55/47-25388-912F2675 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:38:18 -0400
Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q132so46137709lfe.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=OfupAemr5lnCrZpZzW45VewfXc3CwUQxH72JIIZWqG8=;
        b=U647LdOKZUbAedLjdDhIKrsTeJ14Y2HQGzyaY+HezBd6xizJVbxI/Fp1gqiXrxi2NQ
         OvpXRTBcyr7N79rGW03WimKcUHWHpf7s1fmBF6GESypeUv9JPzXMbiRqrWtvuBiCA6PR
         k94R3B9bSg+yoed/ELT7Cxhj3NzEKLBVWd5NpJ9P+ACLIlomDboVfZIcczTESHx7MDLC
         Tu9jullHYO+8ZBSdAdzErCDclcdJ716oZvSSwmcuc41jMqw3bwrhWszZ+VA+1trvlr2M
         LOGqbpvgcXdxX5CzIzTV1Ts63QEnr/4MKFzfiWn8jaBfyds3223JP0oThewRtWSzEpKg
         lBRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=OfupAemr5lnCrZpZzW45VewfXc3CwUQxH72JIIZWqG8=;
        b=Cq/79a0rFmlzNrW6Mt88o8Kddg13wA/MG100/YK80pQchCEM48Z1jdwmRuyycpFujy
         vsnyeA/g7sQBSy8pfnjXoP3BROQF+/u3Ui7Uibd7LS6eXCqzr46a2Y4aEKbJwvviWL6B
         aiWE9Xt+zCjH3WsyStdpoc72s4p+MzD6GXXpDjg7H6dfnv/2Jrt2Vbv7n61jCrGq9Trb
         x/7P7CwnjfVcubHD9Z83XLmLJGBRYW/wUXFeFnI8TWc4au9kxfGGKagzxAwEX/wlfwBw
         8yFYqLuADCVN3LnnBvVtGhZU/cl3lDcCZATyxnNGms2+MmVrRIzNAuBTaEPiD8F0PQHe
         QP4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIOcDzDVwbzbp0MU/qrWeKuoS/baEVkkoTQy/ABqc9IIj6Yma3/ipEGGgtc6Pf0UuT/JbHB7DB0fIXvTA==
X-Received: by 10.25.143.132 with SMTP id r126mr1440653lfd.221.1466102294473;
 Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPwsocFZQdU2bt0OETeJMQYBXVUkK8ygB5jTb4ML3df4GZWdVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU6B7xFoY_tSpxveUEWYF49e78sQ881GAT5WwOh_4Nd=Kg@mail.gmail.com>
 <0df5eed8-5240-8dfe-f7f3-acf551eadb6d@thefsb.org> <8e5d61e4-f43a-bc6b-486e-79a783ee591a@seld.be>
In-Reply-To: <8e5d61e4-f43a-bc6b-486e-79a783ee591a@seld.be>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:38:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocHkg-Zc3YDRS7APjUP1q+6AVxn5Beve3MDeo7dezhhU6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jordi Boggiano <j.boggiano@seld.be>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114037a47773f10535698a07
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] RNG fixes
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

--001a114037a47773f10535698a07
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 at 14:05 Jordi Boggiano <j.boggiano@seld.be> wrote:

> Just a thought here, if the goal is to provide a better interface,
> wouldn't it be better to use OO for this? Not because OO is better, but
> because it would avoid having problems if two mt_rand-using pieces of
> code are executed concurrently.


The goal is to fix inconsistencies. We absolutely can provide a better
interface as something separate though.

--001a114037a47773f10535698a07--