Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94052
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4NrgMJn8SaNkbQ9H=Jn44A5mKK6iEO8BHu7Uab-kY4XpLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c03dafd-093a-0087-6312-96fede93c5f0@gmail.com>
 <BY2PR0201MB17843F26C4E02181DDDED285BF540@BY2PR0201MB1784.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <1c437efe-7f1d-629f-cfbc-41cbcda38d89@fleshgrinder.com> <CAEZPtU6PonqQcT5sQf1FUd-Vwp-qcZ5r0jzL-Cdn3r3=wpLJDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFMT4NoqmuA-LySitfMJS_2d4re5o75jw7FyqDuHWbZD1S6eLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <b1ffc667-8b74-5be8-9945-f5ebee072045@gmail.com> <CAFMT4NrgMJn8SaNkbQ9H=Jn44A5mKK6iEO8BHu7Uab-kY4XpLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:13:22 -0600
Message-ID: <CAFMT4Nq3aikPO5hzquP95Lwm8ehYhGcoyMKqUK4xo=RmS_WMEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Is the "No BC Breaks in Minor Releases" policy enforceable?
From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison)

> I didn't necessarily mean the currently proposed; I mean more
> generally. For instance Nullable Types and the associated
> ReflectionType changes both have small BC breaks that I don't mind. In
> the case of the former there is a long-standing bug that did have BC
> break impact that was fixed. This passed 44 to 1. Stas was the no-vote
> and he can clarify his stance but I do not believe he voted no because
> of the BC break.

Correction; 44 to 2. The other vote was Bwoebi's and he would prefer
full union types.