Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94038
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 207.46.100.109 as permitted sender)
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
References: <CY1PR0201MB1786A3D8145ADCF4225E8C4ABF560@CY1PR0201MB1786.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAEZPtU4cTk5B_414cTou_LaGa0Tg_h=7fmtsLcNhNNYt69sUPw@mail.gmail.com>
CC: Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>, PHP internals
	<internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <cb48db47-3bd4-0e15-add4-2c81dc4da7d7@zend.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:25:42 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU4cTk5B_414cTou_LaGa0Tg_h=7fmtsLcNhNNYt69sUPw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="------------C486A32500F54431F60A56C0"
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: zend.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2016 06:25:56.6903 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0201MB1780
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Accepted] Replace "Missing argument" warning
 with "Too few arguments" exception
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--------------C486A32500F54431F60A56C0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Pierre,


On 06/16/2016 09:18 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry
>
> I am sorry but I have to ask to wait before merging it.
>

Sorry, but this is already merged.
>
> It is definitely not clear that:
>
> . The rfc was valid to begin with due to the short discussion time
> . This BC is acceptable for 7.x
>
> I think things like things can be prevented by following the 
> relatively simple rfc process and having a more clear way to define 
> what is acceptable as BC.
>

I think, the decision of the majority of voters, told that the BC break 
is minor and acceptable for 7.1.
The only mistake was in shorten discussion period.
>
> I think the RMs should step in here.
>

Yeah, I suppose, RMs may have a right to take a decision and revert this.

Thanks. Dmitry.

> Thanks,
> Pierre
>
> On Jun 16, 2016 1:12 PM, "Dmitry Stogov" <dmitry@zend.com 
> <mailto:dmitry@zend.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi internals,
>
>
>     The RFC
>     https://wiki.php.net/rfc/too_few_args<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/t>
>     was accepted by 39 against 11, and the corresponding patch was
>     merged into master.
>
>
>     Thanks. Dmitry.
>


--------------C486A32500F54431F60A56C0--