Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94036
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.53 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0201MB1786A3D8145ADCF4225E8C4ABF560@CY1PR0201MB1786.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CY1PR0201MB1786A3D8145ADCF4225E8C4ABF560@CY1PR0201MB1786.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:18:00 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4cTk5B_414cTou_LaGa0Tg_h=7fmtsLcNhNNYt69sUPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d2f8e2ef20b05355f334f
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Accepted] Replace "Missing argument" warning
 with "Too few arguments" exception
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a113d2f8e2ef20b05355f334f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Dmitry

I am sorry but I have to ask to wait before merging it.

It is definitely not clear that:

. The rfc was valid to begin with due to the short discussion time
. This BC is acceptable for 7.x

I think things like things can be prevented by following the relatively
simple rfc process and having a more clear way to define what is acceptable
as BC.

I think the RMs should step in here.

Thanks,
Pierre
On Jun 16, 2016 1:12 PM, "Dmitry Stogov" <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:

> Hi internals,
>
>
> The RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/too_few_args<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/t>
> was accepted by 39 against 11, and the corresponding patch was merged into
> master.
>
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>

--001a113d2f8e2ef20b05355f334f--