Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:93957 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9183 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2016 16:32:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jun 2016 16:32:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=bobwei9@hotmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=bobwei9@hotmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hotmail.com designates 65.55.111.107 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: bobwei9@hotmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 65.55.111.107 blu004-omc2s32.hotmail.com Received: from [65.55.111.107] ([65.55.111.107:52251] helo=BLU004-OMC2S32.hotmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 63/91-34398-D8130675 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:32:14 -0400 Received: from BLU436-SMTP164 ([65.55.111.72]) by BLU004-OMC2S32.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:32:05 -0700 X-TMN: [hVA3sMO/AiahFFkPGMHaizyLmA7uBJej] X-Originating-Email: [bobwei9@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 18:32:01 +0200 CC: PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: To: Derick Rethans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2016 16:32:03.0685 (UTC) FILETIME=[488A8950:01D1C65A] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Union types From: bobwei9@hotmail.com (Bob Weinand) > Am 14.06.2016 um 17:22 schrieb Derick Rethans : >=20 > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Bob Weinand wrote: >=20 >> It has been long enough under discussion... I've put union types into=20= >> vote. >>=20 >> Please find the RFC located at: >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/union_types = >=20 > Not clear on some of the wording. When you say: >=20 > "This RFC proposes a vote on whether ?Foo shall be replaced by Foo |=20= > null in general." >=20 > Do you mean that ?Foo will no longer be allowed at all if this RFCs=20 > passes? >=20 > cheers, > Derick >=20 Correct. I think there should be only one way to do that; others may = disagree, hence it is a separate vote. Bob=