Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:93700 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16748 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2016 21:28:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Jun 2016 21:28:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:60961] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 78/49-63812-1735F475 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:28:18 -0400 Received: (qmail 9447 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jun 2016 21:28:14 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 9441, pid: 9444, t: 0.1482s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.7?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 1 Jun 2016 21:28:14 -0000 To: PHP internals References: <574EAD78.5000402@lsces.co.uk> <574F487E.6030009@lsces.co.uk> Message-ID: <574F536E.20905@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:28:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Set object properties inline From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 01/06/16 22:09, Rasmus Schultz wrote: > This tendency to "defend" the dynamic side of the language, as though > static features were somehow an "attack" on dynamic features, befuddles me. > > These two sides of the language do not compete with each other - they > complement each other. That is perhaps what *I* am looking for. Being able to manage the attributes of a variable be it statically or dynamically defined should be identical. My 'attack' is that all the current discussions are on developing the static side without any mention of adding the same constraint system to a list of dynamic properties. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk