Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:93684
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pthreads.org from 209.85.213.42 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0201MB1786C24A2569B71BB6C716FBBF470@CY1PR0201MB1786.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CY1PR0201MB1786C24A2569B71BB6C716FBBF470@CY1PR0201MB1786.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 18:42:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAL=_i_npftaNQ=vi2g8crrR57smMsbCMN08nnQteeHkPHc_XAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Nikita Popov <nikic@php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1144034cb036e305343b046c
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Replace "Missing argument" warning with "Too few
 arguments" exception
From: pthreads@pthreads.org (Joe Watkins)

--001a1144034cb036e305343b046c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Evening,

    Could you expand on the "obvious optimization opportunities" in the
document ?

    They are not obvious to me, and even if they were, this document is
part of the history of this change, so a little more detail would be nice.

Cheers
Joe

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:

> hi,
>
>
> Please take a look into the proposal.
>
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/too_few_args
>
>
> The RFC is extremely simple (both proposal and implementation) and almost
> completely described by the email subject.
>
> I think, this mini-RFC doesn't need 2-weeks discussion period, so I'm
> going to start the vote on next week.
>
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>

--001a1144034cb036e305343b046c--