Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:93622 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8842 invoked from network); 29 May 2016 13:29:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 May 2016 13:29:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=colinodell@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=colinodell@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.52 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: colinodell@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.52 mail-oi0-f52.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.52] ([209.85.218.52:36416] helo=mail-oi0-f52.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 44/D1-23584-7BEEA475 for ; Sun, 29 May 2016 09:29:27 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id j1so236647459oih.3 for ; Sun, 29 May 2016 06:29:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5NX09UZu4FYT0O26tF7BJB7BxLUvGQihnvhNRkhSPSU=; b=kBmDtU24preXCISrnCFG3IfvkqSTtrGvFuU5uM5rDUYds/MG8zBJPf0wUiAtvaWfSL h7oeS39MZy3Le9kdBhJa764vup/C069Tg9jgl0w5UO+p5KJAjSatqX9vtnVZH43/SJYe hXbzJQ1L55tUpcIjh5KvOMcU1hRjJjNwuCoZtaLO9qSdkVzLIRn9RzzRswOvA9lZdw2d 7t4FDXf3g65ruKuV2a8h7ojNrfbvoy4tdUg9Bgp/0FiVYUAVZ7GpNT6voyT/lOk5zNRY eUiGgxdlkdzDgBWTUjsUvFT4sIAyhfl0RrlqxZTuCybd006xapKyYGJ20oRXqcspizvK 1pjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5NX09UZu4FYT0O26tF7BJB7BxLUvGQihnvhNRkhSPSU=; b=JoaPv6hAegOTmfpGTTacQtWvhGP2yanhSh1wJbMyjHPTebAjxf8PJLOv9H4Ms/5hZe kRThbsoPJk3NB+Q3LQZhChcFPSorgUDcnyAAqo0Y9roWTAV5WvBGg2hdbCq62DdNQ7Gr iU0OY58KxvxHrurztxcxvs2r+biEbojDZbcTOlAgP+/PUbf6tjynkrhO6pbrR5DF1dFw P8O5gJRJOmEION17GIQ2wN//76BEEodiSzJ4hq0VQmVEyYFzLKMNT5L5rMRaRxqKiXKt Yw9h5SbpviixX7s8gZiZw5Q2nyvDDHU7W/pTjC23Xzl1HeDFcak8RM8H88K5PPaNWTar oS5g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL0S9Nu4qoBgprcQisOhs7t9yjjtKitYLRP85+fISmyogEsv1vVlCGVcazsphgKYRzjfze4DmMonTtNAA== X-Received: by 10.157.15.163 with SMTP id d32mr15759047otd.160.1464528564285; Sun, 29 May 2016 06:29:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5d4346eb-1f1e-5227-1b64-ebf8f33c91ba@fleshgrinder.com> In-Reply-To: <5d4346eb-1f1e-5227-1b64-ebf8f33c91ba@fleshgrinder.com> Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 13:29:14 +0000 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net Cc: jmikola@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d0f04d6782b0533fb20d2 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Discussion] array_change_keys() From: colinodell@gmail.com ("Colin O'Dell") --001a113d0f04d6782b0533fb20d2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Does this RFC really require a 2/3 majority? I mean, it does not change > the syntax or alters anything. It is just about a single new function? > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#required_majority > Good catch! You're right, this RFC only adds a single new function and does not modify the syntax or anything else. I've updated the RFC's voting section accordingly. Colin --001a113d0f04d6782b0533fb20d2--