Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:93507
Return-Path: <me@rouvenwessling.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 85764 invoked from network); 25 May 2016 15:09:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 25 May 2016 15:09:35 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=me@rouvenwessling.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=me@rouvenwessling.de; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain rouvenwessling.de from 80.241.60.212 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: me@rouvenwessling.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.241.60.212 mx1.mailbox.org  
Received: from [80.241.60.212] ([80.241.60.212:60405] helo=mx1.mailbox.org)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 5F/01-14311-E20C5475 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 25 May 2016 11:09:35 -0400
Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589BC44261;
	Wed, 25 May 2016 17:09:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de
Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240])
	by gerste.heinlein-support.de (gerste.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.173]) (amavisd-new, port 10030)
	with ESMTP id PUYYtv9-CPK0; Wed, 25 May 2016 17:09:21 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_64AB2463-1C06-444A-AC1F-7F73BC13827B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR0201MB1784E772EC4052E6453F2A5CBF400@BY2PR0201MB1784.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 17:09:19 +0200
Cc: Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>,
 Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>,
 PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>,
 Phil Sturgeon <pjsturgeon@gmail.com>,
 Bob Weinand <bwoebi@php.net>
Message-ID: <F63120DC-9A2A-4EBE-A015-C20782E7289E@rouvenwessling.de>
References: <CAL=_i_mcJoFnPgeU5FQCJN=SDYnNK7Jz8zoVMv9EMuWaGRYSMg@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR0201MB17845690B6386D75AF4C3D79BF4F0@BY2PR0201MB1784.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAL=_i_=EqNoHvXmY+RdQW-reC4YF8AkuWFtGGJGOOSqX4a010g@mail.gmail.com> <cfe8404a-54f6-24b7-0ba8-8f807c820821@zend.com> <CAL=_i_kze8MNSmpg4WT+EJCRPmvty=8DA6DkuHSx+WCBzJjytg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF+90c9cBqKfy_q5rME1u56Rq366niYUBDTY+3_2iFJSZD9fDA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL=_i_nrrtsNHMhxeTPxPE4jYyzyWRHQNHVuSp12z8U++ESDhA@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR0201MB1784E772EC4052E6453F2A5CBF400@BY2PR0201MB1784.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote] Typed Properties
From: me@rouvenwessling.de (=?utf-8?Q?Rouven_We=C3=9Fling?=)

--Apple-Mail=_64AB2463-1C06-444A-AC1F-7F73BC13827B
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii


> On 25 May 2016, at 16:56, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
>=20
> - unset() of typed properties should not be allowed

Potentially opening a larger can of worms: what is the use case of =
unsetting any declared property?

Changing this would of course be a huge BC break but it seems less weird =
then having different rules for typed vs untyped properties.

Cheers,
Rouven=

--Apple-Mail=_64AB2463-1C06-444A-AC1F-7F73BC13827B--