Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:93125 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67116 invoked from network); 9 May 2016 06:51:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 May 2016 06:51:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=peter.e.lind@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=peter.e.lind@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: peter.e.lind@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.48 mail-wm0-f48.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.48] ([74.125.82.48:38283] helo=mail-wm0-f48.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E6/61-60415-88330375 for ; Mon, 09 May 2016 02:51:54 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id g17so168627564wme.1 for ; Sun, 08 May 2016 23:51:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kff09B4aqRVhyFe5ZruY8Ni5hOIXukZXM4dlX5dgJ+U=; b=NEhL06K4n0G4FoqULg+5S/ZTm+rKxRiR6XKFdz87zRgBLPvVFv6RNdll4tNSeUxo12 m3e6bjoWF0aRKJOxy3X30JCuIM5adxYC4xSeBZ4o0eWKjj4KZAVzUCLYbHBcHU3Wtm8D bEQ7lbTRSSB+gLC/LeMoFiAjvfSYWBqfQxCJhqe6qPN7dw3XejfXUVrw20aXs8q0Ba2A Rc0q89GCTZef3gfe9SzLUP8rDkuMMfPx+UmQK0Pl41O0inJqPyvqcuoE+JlR0ur4c0I8 nFHCSP2XSqfVcBxTH+UEnjoSiAnMGuM3ee5CtARGLFXFxJJoVJjQ+68u0mIko5Kc1kfV CQbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kff09B4aqRVhyFe5ZruY8Ni5hOIXukZXM4dlX5dgJ+U=; b=h1k7MA4XKAp5TNO/ulqc6l3WrDUumY8N1nmLTnIAOP4wuUy5GtOxpcE19yXv3TJmnQ d7NSXF9siazqnbiIgSTswitP3dr8JO3exMnvlew31eE+06cZFnGC2UT3JbLKAVz0hY/m HIH6dfGJzGtKElJElCP4WzqMCLg/M5sr8XM5zczZxELVYti4MyWJ+GYZrTDICoNsfcWl 2oQt+/YuTck5msF3bQrlCo8hei7klYJw78F7nU8wQL+NIMZDMC8pJIumKxFZ0nHSWcmi 977im25RSkcvXxl3sX3QdbjXuWiYK5C5mFoMti8KXD7hgYc79LX4kPowSbPFbJGwEG2C DW5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUMpyhGDd9x5lSXV6QVRgHj1Ur2hw7n20zsM/3OHv2x9ifjCGHO39TMJosCwbBoBxbtSLOsKjNzddPIhQ== X-Received: by 10.28.63.148 with SMTP id m142mr8900502wma.85.1462776710036; Sun, 08 May 2016 23:51:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.105.38 with HTTP; Sun, 8 May 2016 23:51:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7dfb5ef1-3e13-1d57-28d0-29f6301c76d5@gmail.com> References: <39071a01-a42c-0952-b3a8-b4769c79b56b@fleshgrinder.com> <0ac3be89-6fb4-610a-ef89-0928f264f96c@fleshgrinder.com> <71379db5-b7b8-78b3-ada5-eee34e6e22d6@fleshgrinder.com> <7dfb5ef1-3e13-1d57-28d0-29f6301c76d5@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:51:30 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b460e3004b60532633efb Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Pipe Operator From: peter.e.lind@gmail.com (Peter Lind) --001a114b460e3004b60532633efb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 9 May 2016 at 08:45, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > > I have the feeling that if everyone involved *explicitly* prefixed their > > opinions with "I think that", this would be a better and more fruitful > > Is there any other option? > As in "better options"? I don't think so. As in "could my statement be taken any other way"? Clearly, as the way you put it forward you were claiming not that you though things unobvious, but that they were unobvious. You are trying to make the exact same argument, in different words, in your argument below. > > > discussion. *You* think the syntax completely unobvious - that doesn't > > make it so. Clearly others find it much easier to read. > > If you think it's obvious - it also doesn't make it so, then. That is a logical conclusion, yes. I didn't state my opinion on the pipe operator, though. > It appears > we have no way to determine if it's obvious or not. But I'd like to > venture a proposal - find somebody who is not familiar with this > proposal and maybe even with PHP and ask them - what do you think * or + > or -> may mean in PHP? If they are familiar with any other languages > like PHP, they would venture a guess with would be pretty close to the > truth. Now ask them what |> and $$ may mean. Are you ready to tell me > their answers would be as accurate and close to the truth as before? > Are you willing to argue that PHP should never implement features not found commonly in other languages? Because that's where you're going with that argument. Regards Peter -- CV: careers.stackoverflow.com/peterlind LinkedIn: plind Twitter: kafe15 --001a114b460e3004b60532633efb--