Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92896
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 65.55.169.124 as permitted sender)
To: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
CC: Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>, internals <internals@lists.php.net>,
	Tom Worster <fsb@thefsb.org>
Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for
 only return values
Thread-Index: AQHRoWRe782dRDYm1kuNWD0UZVTnlZ+fm7+pgAALLYCAAAAymoAAAjiAgAACLoCAAA56AIAAAHIigAADwQCAAAE64g==
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:16:44 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR0201MB1784A82C5FBADA86939A21CBBF650@BY2PR0201MB1784.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAFMT4NpBi80uJ-_-==4Wd5h87k=fq3h7N9ygph1kCHg9Czc_Kw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BY2PR0201MB17848D27325287FFD9785771BF650@BY2PR0201MB1784.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAFMT4Nr+m4LVQC81+quTwzhu1tSzLq=Zd_fvJwpo_HfnNshSKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BY2PR0201MB178472C732BF8DEE68D8D940BF650@BY2PR0201MB1784.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAFMT4Nrj4c+y+j7tMr42NoMTNq_9Xf9jGNo2jLFUy153K=ks7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL=_i_kPW8yiynJ=Qksjz_BCZ1FCwck28_+rCk1Jn94qUDh+fg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFMT4No4atnAQ4oRYXLKLb4JGMBG=HMhWOi6JXs=K0HbKsANEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BY2PR0201MB17847220E76760C84BB5AACBBF650@BY2PR0201MB1784.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>,<CAFMT4NpKOqqqDjXqkoZjRFaMuuhpsXvhgpnef3DPpk-toHN8wA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4NpKOqqqDjXqkoZjRFaMuuhpsXvhgpnef3DPpk-toHN8wA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Apr 2016 19:16:44.9603
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 32210298-c08b-4829-8097-6b12c025a892
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0201MB1784
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for
 only return values
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

Levi, I provided an implementation for your RFC on February 2015, and I wou=
ld be glad if your RFC was accepted that time.
Bit since that time you block it in respect to "Union Types"

See conversation at PR https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1045

I would be also glad if your "Nullable Types" RFC was accepted now, but I d=
on't trust in your intention to support it.

________________________________________
From: morrison.levi@gmail.com <morrison.levi@gmail.com> on behalf of Levi M=
orrison <levim@php.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 10:02:20 PM
To: Dmitry Stogov
Cc: Joe Watkins; internals; Tom Worster
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for=
 only return values

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> Levi, I don't understand, why do you keep trying to own "Nullable Types" =
RFC, if you like completely different "Union Types".

I don't understand; I wrote the RFC. What do you mean, "keep trying to
own" it? I wrote both Nullable Types and Union Types. Some view those
RFC's as competing, but they can also be orthogonal. I see the value
in having both.