Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92895 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82146 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2016 19:02:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Apr 2016 19:02:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.175 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.175 mail-pf0-f175.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.175] ([209.85.192.175:33331] helo=mail-pf0-f175.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CD/5B-28296-F3E52275 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:02:24 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 206so37459199pfu.0 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:02:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=RQaXODBwHUTwCkzaQfN/qeiHemoK8umCEdoq61fv9q0=; b=bbtaZ61NzLpm/nzONAndmLjFLf2yGSn031F7XG33/xfHS9Uq3AU0qYsrA6mXkd6dqy ftFy+zeXo0g0prPW7WGknYj5WuoiA9/1OxFpALQcxY8GazMt9FZmiSxLZ2ZbG76PFsJD waA703tnztd0TcpXpYaZhxboRquuMo4nvPviQL1xLiTdYmyl4ibY+Z7xSQ2n18fSY+uN 69Z+aR6BHxxkEX+9ZQXQn1DGCbJI/TobxYtSocyd9UHx9N17/kXJVq8EeU/3gl/bL/g+ vau17nIE1DW5F/LDa/JIdXBMwXAmDO3jGxJ2xcKnO1NCtQLl/dfGzq58B+/vEFtgzdEW XnDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=RQaXODBwHUTwCkzaQfN/qeiHemoK8umCEdoq61fv9q0=; b=brm2OpbeyprE2/sLkae3eZpmSnawxB21ZJlP7ofgXd5Rqb9l1qxhb7JaorRrB1wC+C 1KawYzEe4K5moqrFb46xhEmG06apUFoSypfsjKTCoWS7SxTkoDUJfSGcc2wqi3BLBNKX x14Lz8Pfcn2lehTkkwnibFyqfDE6kU8ApXus+4xp5zh/mIA0FwUBEaapNc9di0uG49bz ZMNWY4w0qxkdG860yZoThdC596h3Avqp7RwixTNB614K8EbUr/Wm3U5qqtl4ezX55IZb 9ftiuT7QnmHUHA8q1OE0gvp0Iu99aaJpXAGHH/TkE+ryHe3QEj1YEGBrgDLSZTSMWGRW J4vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXApoS5tdaYZH7a1yicFgx8bgI/J3Zn6lwG09PhKsDcAy1HbKUimRYxcZn7PPHgDvqp61XfE7NP6/tI9w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.98.29.16 with SMTP id d16mr22703399pfd.142.1461870140962; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com Received: by 10.66.132.79 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:02:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:02:20 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dJcgFCqDaBm21sMIDCqDs7ysslo Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: Joe Watkins , internals , Tom Worster Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for only return values From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison) On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > Levi, I don't understand, why do you keep trying to own "Nullable Types" RFC, if you like completely different "Union Types". I don't understand; I wrote the RFC. What do you mean, "keep trying to own" it? I wrote both Nullable Types and Union Types. Some view those RFC's as competing, but they can also be orthogonal. I see the value in having both.