Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92877 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50882 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2016 17:39:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Apr 2016 17:39:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.171 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.171 mail-pf0-f171.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.171] ([209.85.192.171:34253] helo=mail-pf0-f171.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A1/94-28296-ABA42275 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:39:07 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f171.google.com with SMTP id y69so36358678pfb.1 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:39:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=hrqo7tM/7xXWtSEADSkH93xlz4OqGKR1GrHZiLScpUY=; b=TGMaf3VxCv7TJdS9ADBlZx/f+dOK7SRtVFg1Uik424PESNxTRCDSAfyc/Pr/E1KKGv lCtHV+D5T7Kga+DQYFvSXlNfy+CN24SDSNSTh9zeM9GY0xQugtUaA2mEewrMJnnH7DX4 vzROOpKmJxGWbIQVUmUw5Xnwb/WWYMtZV+NlMD/zX5b7Pu9Oy1hr7UNLKbCC1KHQWTtz EgHNJ2/2hEenwhZ8K8u71Wq653kSNefciZEEq0CMQqGGZqIh5MFKzDr7bEISO1sp5yrD KkhfeXPPhPLuhxJi5kYLPfyx/3AJa1bGL9l1JQLwQCcBmwA21sv8S2yVqTFv7KKAVS0b gfow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=hrqo7tM/7xXWtSEADSkH93xlz4OqGKR1GrHZiLScpUY=; b=eGCeMPJGdzVQtFKvtIwiE+0GI71OCqTnHM/6Zikds/47Yclf+HR400eVk4ChTZ/YbK HwH2m14cBWW5BlmLBhCzXe1YGnrPYeLR166JSZqucGGioeV90F4N+Asxf7GO7VGxpyVF NI2TnA8cds/42tgFJr7HUdvXUF4scSNJV7LfARHgcWJLHiHiqh1qY9QpQ/e/tpjS80iz V7frS953TSryhUjrSVWIny7XdjPLgytEUJzMpVolcgR6FaRLPGwp6tWw3aXTJumJGho7 gp5nrA+Ai/nq/YY/mWWqNJPHNvUxLjPJrqHg76FZ36CanBmyh4FoVU+c37RL3NPdhnUR lorw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX8dON45tGVqZEmiae4PwzQpNEGsVQtmKLZkFpG6iawj5bw8AQi/Rk04cXFWhHL3LFqHCddA6jNI4+u+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.98.29.16 with SMTP id d16mr22145828pfd.142.1461865143955; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com Received: by 10.66.132.79 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:39:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:39:03 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dX6dzX2idWoCRBFTUXn1UtZYWB4 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: internals , Tom Worster Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for only return values From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison) On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > Thanks for catching the BC break. > Fortunately, we didn't release 7.0.6 with this problem. > > I see some sense in introducing that check, but changing behaviour requires RFC and definitely not allowed in minor versions. > > I'm not going to withdraw https://wiki.php.net/rfc/nullable_return_types > It doesn't prohibit usage of nullable for arguments, and even sets additional question. In that case: are you fine with my RFCs going to vote first (and soon)? We presently have four somewhat competing RFCs and need to work out voting order. Tom: are you willing to withdraw or wait for my RFCs to vote first?