Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92837 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7881 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2016 12:20:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Apr 2016 12:20:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierrick@webstart.fr; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierrick@webstart.fr; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain webstart.fr from 209.85.161.179 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierrick@webstart.fr X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.179 mail-yw0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.179] ([209.85.161.179:33789] helo=mail-yw0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C8/15-20013-F6EA0275 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:19:59 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id t10so75772400ywa.0 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 05:19:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=webstart-fr.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=Cc2W1byDGr6vGND7iscopLbmLaPA9e3i5rHgWYEB3Rg=; b=pO3yhDZOJ0Agr4RhklVRVI/GI4q24bjGAiy5tOAiQ6r8iNauZr6tQjskw6s7WIy+j5 /ZDn+M794IIJgxKVIcKa4d1cmQmZ8hhErDsiCIgY0/JwpACnbqUKNDPpv15uRiWIwLEA hp+h6BR/4UlbN6jwWT3SYINuj10f3uCwqq9UA0MeIc3UiL1cow+EsG71Gubzn0oJT5eP BN//QgWrwyx2tCsnSUuoPIpxgmdHzPiBPzpZoYRhAwzoGipPgUT3WmtEGGNIYIrV0nG4 MCy5aHD6HH+RB6WdWM0ZVNzfHi0EMBavnhzuuUVE3daHHNf0k6tTb/K+br9KOVaOZe9r 8ahA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Cc2W1byDGr6vGND7iscopLbmLaPA9e3i5rHgWYEB3Rg=; b=AULyxXIG2yH6fCV8IXr+amRgBhm2yuyp1QiRmoEppCYP6wFKYpwtR3jvQnCJcbj/Uf uDXJ+sN3p5z+tQ6sh6lb1wFGmrhlt+2u8rD44QrdkSDGEWermkxAZ1HdZrQwuLfe6bx1 mb3YFF+kRWoT6BFwbFWUjdq7KWVUoQTwDD4Wigp1mZRbBLaXWsfAeROuyDE8felxkDeX lBEY/4pBxsXiYQyXZfZp06mn0Z7DYCEeXO1umm5rJ0LwChRNHIpuYNvmitTDCO2u5CFu kUaZN0CcR0R6+TFfRdGPzAL3pYLQr7Vw93IMh7W5a6UCw8vjiO0yf54iuafafzPVoTkG 9kBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXcpxR4E+btFrWCuxJftytnSJJQm5fZmQMueZKk3OHXuhErxzbBPEJCFIuSQxo9E1q8Q8tsPXWCP7MGfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.148.2 with SMTP id l2mr4457142ywg.298.1461759596687; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 05:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: pierrick@webstart.fr Received: by 10.37.81.7 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 05:19:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <059601d1a050$90fa0fb0$b2ee2f10$@belski.net> References: <059601d1a050$90fa0fb0$b2ee2f10$@belski.net> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:19:56 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3tjbr3Clpfi-eFLZJGbBipFFse4 Message-ID: To: Anatol Belski Cc: Davey Shafik , PHP internals , pajoye@php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c07b516824c690531766d67 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: ext/curl update From: pierrick@adoy.net (Pierrick Charron) --94eb2c07b516824c690531766d67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree, but I don't really now how I could test those things since they almost all of the time only affect how libcurl will handle the request/cache and we have no way to retrieve options like curl_easy_getopt or something similar. On 27 April 2016 at 02:46, Anatol Belski wrote: > Hi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: me@daveyshafik.com [mailto:me@daveyshafik.com] On Behalf Of Davey > > Shafik > > Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 2:25 AM > > To: Pierrick Charron > > Cc: PHP internals ; pajoye@php.net > > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: ext/curl update > > > > Hi Pierrick, > > > > This should be in master for 7.1, alongside my RFC'ed patch for server > push > > support. > > > > You emailed me directly about the aforementioned patch so I'll just > respond > > here as it's relevant: > > > > The patch should hit in 7.1 but it has been requested that tests be > added =E2=80=94 and > > we can't add tests with a server push supporting HTTP/2 server against > which to > > push. > > > As from the patch, many constants have nothing to do with HTTP/2 > implementation and add just name/value without any further logic. If ther= e > were a reduced patch with only such cases, it would be acceptable for 7.0 > as well and there were probably no collisions expected. What do you think= ? > > Regards > > Anatol > > --94eb2c07b516824c690531766d67--