Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92812
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain webstart.fr from 209.85.161.173 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: pierrick@webstart.fr
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0201MB17867883CAF70F426788E531BF630@CY1PR0201MB1786.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BY2PR0201MB178479B3AF8BD49583233034BF6E0@BY2PR0201MB1784.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
	<CA+kxMuSxAWkNXai0kgW1b1anSohn63frjw76puo1PyCB=xWx=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFMT4NrAshwagmGr6RcadbnLGoe71huA7yYcLYhW-Yf7ohFHGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<571DD94B.3060604@zend.com>
	<571E63D0.8080800@gmail.com>
	<9c24f969-cb0e-cb46-a23c-6e06e7de7d79@gmail.com>
	<571E7C08.6010309@gmail.com>
	<571F1B95.9030203@zend.com>
	<CAFKaYMqbPiHsWJpSKLgV-Yvtpwz9MiA_U243=NRtaTtOrXs+fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFKaYMpzuA6suSDascKppspwAnqSpVviY9J01B=NqbpUfBUqJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFKaYMpTM9VNkAUAKPqbDFjf+3AgJu1Yw1x_rR5-TOp64AjctA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CY1PR0201MB17867883CAF70F426788E531BF630@CY1PR0201MB1786.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:33:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOfKkdQa7o-WUh5PB+KVnKxwwjtCXuMX0MQUrnOycNCXfePrCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>, Dominic Grostate <codekestrel@googlemail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114ecbc682a06905316787d7
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] PHP Attributes
From: pierrick@adoy.net (Pierrick Charron)

--001a114ecbc682a06905316787d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

And it will probably be in conflict with the Short Array Syntax ?

On 26 April 2016 at 13:14, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:

> Just because HHVM is closer to PHP than C#.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dominic Grostate <codekestrel@googlemail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 19:43
> To: Dmitry Stogov
> Cc: rowan.collins@gmail.com; PHP internals; Stanislav Malyshev
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] PHP Attributes
>
>
> Why not like C#?
>
> [Description("My Function")]
> function my_function()
> {}
>
> Without the semicolon, this wouldn't be valid in any other context.
>
> On 26 Apr 2016 8:41 a.m., "Dmitry Stogov" <dmitry@zend.com<mailto:
> dmitry@zend.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/25/2016 11:20 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> No, but this is valid:
>
> @atrr(); function foo() { ... }
>
> That's perhaps a little too close for comfort...?
> That's different syntax. If you put ; in the middle of statement, it can
> change - "$c = $a + $b;" is not the same as "$c = $a; + $b;" - but
> nobody thinks + can not be used because of that. As I said, << and >>
> are existing operators too, so if you are creative enough, I'm sure you
> can find cases like that too.
>
> Hi Stas,
>
> You may try to replace attribute syntax with @attr(...) (without
> semicolon) into our PHP parser.
> Note that we have LALR grammar + restrictions caused by semantic actions.
> If you are able to do this, I'll add it into the RFC as an option.
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--001a114ecbc682a06905316787d7--