Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92796 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97245 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2016 16:21:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Apr 2016 16:21:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.19 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.19] ([212.227.15.19:49867] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2A/22-20013-3A59F175 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:21:56 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.102] ([84.187.31.83]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRo6b-1bJ7sq1C5B-00Syxm; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:21:41 +0200 To: Dmitry Stogov , Joe Watkins References: <571F7A2D.5080000@zend.com> Cc: Levi Morrison , internals , Bob Weinand , fsb@thefsb.org Message-ID: <571F9595.1090201@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:21:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <571F7A2D.5080000@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2U/1pCdauzbr2EtTwjjaeDu5INUUXHFtwKHPpuLiiLI8ybhIMTf lQF0CGSFv7FwklRMPCFKe7owTZ8WtErJWJ56qaD/nR3IjtyO4boWOI++tvvJwrMlbm1j+a7 QYdf8kPt0NbPgEa9e4DWPexqyVDiqyg0prvw8SrUpba4hp1yN/+uRD76ciRk9YBCExLO+Gd 0eFM7HQaBnKVVT1JXCL5w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:yEk982p0Sz0=:v7ZddOQ6g3QlFc5aPimcSx 4FyB4aX2p7xCg+9vgFtHIQZkDhKPcsok7kZ8+xDwI/EggNjYNSwcBaO4XzEZzvT2ydLXwRsiY DfS5NnGZwO/cKQOxaIt77PAEWxFVvv0N1SkG9U4Dh4dTn4zvPnjS6J26F5pPUSywoREzaQdkW N5R7P0PvwDKkbkenbem46bSJ8r/bVLRvvc7LRM8A9hHE69BAwhriFyV420e7q6jqSIdfa79Bd NBBxLMX2sqRmPxwK4xmA2MFoCCX/kopyeiEKESJdTiMMC9OlLuXcs69oS2VD2FDoC8WBMiwge nsBc545tnz9omFQOevI7MHU7uoGpqH4ZdGTGNJQu+0RZw1tMG+hB/VPFvafwxsqrn3VRHlJLg 6JzbLCFys3O3ziCw8qMUjdzKBbT2EfOZMhwPqk49Dm53ADOr8CHh9q1w8SMpRQixgRiK3JSeT 0ykc9OyNL1ao7D2wRVEvVJ1jlz76bOps244bW0Gxydc4F/alQ3SLHCHkZDRIs+B7r5Du2eSxB 2ZcDiDzQrrkzWs8VeTD2C/RnyVtkL+NPobC/nqId4cNmIgH636p9ft2qytE43d4/sM5SNI9QS trwaswlm+gOgo7dVCO+nfGsA73KVTumOi1Sr7iZLzzsIVr+7NrYzyqhQL/pYLTOLa81p7vdz3 2ssAv6r5CKqtaWxNz1LhzX4ItaISzEuMhVsr7N4AoynQTuqyGMku/pGoZgrs0iiNmapRflPDB C8QBmroKtGpt7J3uFcAjNhKu3akiqlX+fa/ZN/m8asGG52vlOrbfWZ/OGYH9WI1yXM0/Umu/Q 88shbij Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Patch for Union and Intersection Types From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker) On 26.04.2016 at 16:24, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > At first, I'm glad this implementation is ready. > At least it's possible to analyze its profs and cons. > I'm also sure that both RFCs have their opponents and advocates. > > Now, I just like to make the final voting fair. I'm a bit confused, as there is actually a third related RFC, namely Tom Worster's "Nullable Return Type Declaration" (), which apparently is still under discussion. Will voting on this RFC also start tomorrow? -- Christoph M. Becker