Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92717 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8334 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2016 08:51:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Apr 2016 08:51:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=me@kelunik.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=me@kelunik.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain kelunik.com from 81.169.146.163 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: me@kelunik.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.146.163 mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de Received: from [81.169.146.163] ([81.169.146.163:22631] helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 07/B1-00233-E9ADD175 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 04:51:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1461574299; l=2324; s=domk; d=kelunik.com; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version; bh=2UgQNSUG53a/hBTGfj/eGqdSCBr4zLeHCzjckOZHvBE=; b=H8roZe/5zardiq/0q9XL7uoadF3sdxh9y8fLasXC5gB0bKvFwrkNBrLpZUZhce1LczI p+7jmmfSqULpynY/1s+Nx19LFaAmcCT2cFauE24lBt6jgo4sq8ZVdXBWhlkt/Qte7t568 fM7IXBo0XgQVkmEj2mvGPqGly6SsplsSvbk= X-RZG-AUTH: :IWkkfkWkbvHsXQGmRYmUo9mls2vWuiu+7SLGvomb4bl9EfHtO3E6 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.24 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id z07555s3P8pdeIb (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp384r1 with 384 ECDH bits, eq. 7680 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:51:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e201so77618328wme.0 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 01:51:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWcpScD9My1scWQI5sUWu1cepzJJACnqT7NzrOt5L0MGs0yP6j2UBXfDUO07o8TwGfdlF8ejC+Jc61e7w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.103.11 with SMTP id b11mr11514276wmc.93.1461574299390; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 01:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.93.145 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 01:51:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <571DD5DF.9090906@zend.com> References: <571B94C1.1070307@fleshgrinder.com> <571DD5DF.9090906@zend.com> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:51:39 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b31b8eda0c705314b4849 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] PHP Attributes From: me@kelunik.com (Niklas Keller) --001a114b31b8eda0c705314b4849 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > I think that the Hack name attributes is unintelligible and annotations >> would be much clearer to any audience. Simply because the name is very >> well known. >> > > Different languages names this differently. > I may add an additional voting question - "annotation vs attributes?". The description on https://wiki.php.net/rfc even uses "annotation" to explain what "PHP Attributes" is, so I think "annotation"is the right naming choice. PHP Attributes > Native support for annotation (Discussion began 2016-04-22) Annotation is well known and unambiguous. Regards, Niklas. --001a114b31b8eda0c705314b4849--