Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92636 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95775 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2016 10:49:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Apr 2016 10:49:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:37418] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3C/12-14036-26DF9175 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 06:31:03 -0400 Received: (qmail 6096 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2016 10:30:48 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 6086, pid: 6092, t: 0.0707s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.7?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 22 Apr 2016 10:30:48 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Message-ID: <5719FD58.3080009@lsces.co.uk> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:30:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] PHP Attributes From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 21/04/16 22:13, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > I would like to present an RFC proposing support for native annotation. I thought that the debate had been completed on annotation, and since most of the work can be done in a stand alone extension, the various parties were going to take that route and develop working options which could then be compared to decide if any provide a suitable replacement for the current docbloc 'process' that most of the IDE's currently recognise. There is room for proper documentation of the current standard as some elements are not followed reliably, but on the whole the system works, and any of the new extensions need to be addressed via IDE projects before they can replace that. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk