Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92392
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.65 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <57115F42.2030502@gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXb-jON8qZyje_ETckyO-KCmcbhTjcJt=NJZ1agAgzqMoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZx7zc1=1zyx=vJvZtr7x7OhktDFCHMK4GdOCD_DSqbKCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXaZnsGnrKAAPmxHG+hut3+1=8bdOER--WrsXXowoiXu=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZyHruaK9NM4C-4PcQ-2x4QK52Lv+JAyhLHoP=ufcufjWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXb14ucv2PyHeVHMTcvUrqXD+QehqYHiBZtsqcXW1tgjXA@mail.gmail.com>
 <570D2F74.7060702@gmail.com> <CAGa2bXaysM4jcdOzW9ZXzFD_XOgkxphTH_JC0__HEYTNeCniHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <57115F42.2030502@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:26:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXYSLBXPQ_JRFFDt_mPqjY5JL8qo-K2teZ8xn6ja2T7gbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discussion] Add session_gc()
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

Hi Stas,

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All of PHP users _should_ avoid probability based GC
>> whenever it is possible. Why we shouldn't have API that kills
>> custom of probability based usage?
>
> No, they shouldn't. Just claiming that your favorite use case should fit
> everybody does not make it so.

What's the rationale behind your opinion?
I don't see reasonable/logical reasoning.

Probability based GC is unreliable and can reactivate very old sessions
without "Precise session management RFC" and you opposed the RFC.

Reactivating obsoleted/should be deleted session is wrong simply.
Why users shouldn't matter?

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net