Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92210 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70106 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2016 06:19:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Apr 2016 06:19:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cornelius.howl@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cornelius.howl@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cornelius.howl@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.193 mail-ob0-f193.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.193] ([209.85.214.193:36137] helo=mail-ob0-f193.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9D/65-28094-9639C075 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:19:22 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f193.google.com with SMTP id rf6so468177obc.3 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 23:19:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=d7o9wBiBZBE9wgzEMAH8a9ULOb/R819TTm/6UNZ6wxg=; b=ikF8UOBSx80A0SYnwvkjknUQzLutkRtEKBMPB1aVYl6pNcntQb6yQa8YpJZ0J5zN6s I+5nvuYkqkY+mSfl5fqZD2qn9ZRqrg7WwLX377K7lVo6w9gsdkdKZBxfqDxnPGNQCEM/ a5dPj1xo1Uu9Y0ohNLCW5lskKYOuhWjFHTe/h2YZ8PFpUmudrTmJ1D1ZvrodGJY2dxV1 LwzDYmji3qCgFcq4YRelHgW8tBYmxIJHLhUC0m0oeL3e+02zeBKA3g1pl3JAb0sasebP vnFvVmhyTe3PIzxUvnTJYwfYPtqtjR2HAqdzRAxY07elbHTUN5oWCmRPFodhrtKxCPH2 WWEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=d7o9wBiBZBE9wgzEMAH8a9ULOb/R819TTm/6UNZ6wxg=; b=F+wNCnST3GP5Am5Rk9qADgK4h4z0M7SPNmxTX8bOu6AJh0uQK8jeJZw9ebs3WNNlNI O2XisqCv40iSeMyfDtv8nAFyb3f+SFckbWpmNpI4yUiKiDBnY8AB6e0ezl7t6kRD91a/ 4teK1wyre4W9jV+0c3b3cQw4OMImZSKo01UXDV1Iyo9m+vgVDfSAHWEQCIREn4se19Qn hBJECtmBHxUCbtRKv/XY1MbWtw4vo7ZWU82W4eemqh4R5kIKhPIg3sHTIHtk83Z539DJ /kHPzdelZ5tpYgWXAByvBZzOy3TR+7HFKKNZfQ5yW+883hET0DsZUYnB8QIgQkwXk4/X CN3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVv4uET7xQo9p9C0rRCLjnq7tlSWXW+X8/AESMRsQoSP3mWfCRDfp+zHTYm/IQo43Te6m/7/ISZm9Jh9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.96.42 with SMTP id dp10mr676207obb.50.1460441958808; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 23:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.7.194 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 23:19:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <570BC881.8000203@zend.com> References: <570BC881.8000203@zend.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:19:18 +0800 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: Xinchen Hui , Nikita Popov , Bob Weinand , Joe Watkins , internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c230362b88b1053043a454 Subject: Re: Object getter method optimization From: cornelius.howl@gmail.com (Lin Yo-An) --001a11c230362b88b1053043a454 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > Or... maybe we shall move the function info related functions into the > core? since we might have some optimization based on the function info > instead of optimizing opcode only in the future. > > We consider, possibility of moving the whole Optimizer into Zend, but it > won't change a lot, because expensive optimization make sense only with > opcache (when script is optimized once and executed many times). > Is this something I can help? I mean, moving the core of func info into the core. I think I might need to postpone the accessor optimization before the func_info is integrated into the core since it's the best place to store the accessor information. Best Regards, Yo-An Lin --001a11c230362b88b1053043a454--