Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92197 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15237 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2016 16:04:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Apr 2016 16:04:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cornelius.howl@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cornelius.howl@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cornelius.howl@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.182 mail-ob0-f182.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.182] ([209.85.214.182:35177] helo=mail-ob0-f182.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 23/61-07428-90BCB075 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:04:26 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k9so17563574obk.2 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:04:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=juOQGpH4W1RRXm8RxRATJibSG/ilYU7SZqybvziyD0o=; b=q/133rVsGVraunnMaXQsr/YWP2A+YhnG3ZnygGBRiQfhulopj6D6sWuM82Clj8/DA/ RRVTDI2++GKZQD9Gok6W7zbK/5RVm9IvLMetKOOJO/kaBTzKfcbMuGo0djUVc19gFhFA ZjuNS5klD+fumIX/W+ehApGxu4QEp+o47obIVo170AUe4mAAb1rieIG/FcUxg+vPrXA8 VDEjTzPm0Wmxy+F/MYxxmqwr47jFaF8C/XEb20frzU/KwUoEWDakRb3epHnqSc/vThBN PwTviBrVWJvPtlhd9kI4Nm5JxpeKthr6Ne6WQOfClnr/1/fVHLSxiwj3oSi5q2lfi1Ep GK3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=juOQGpH4W1RRXm8RxRATJibSG/ilYU7SZqybvziyD0o=; b=FOaTC+tm5Q6/9eZ1UcgUQd3xIGGUIYN72wdgqZH5mwNKJGlsgn6AqZTQ4DLJyrCIhc w6jEnGse6XhhTnkCzkdUWFY7kQWZhqhUVKQ5j090VylKv7XEuZJZuCnakcr5aB/qzr/9 Ce6LXwmBXQgOeyQo9LABMcFuz/ntUk9jZOi8O0k4XC9xUoZocZNje6M+FWPsb6d/kyFT mdzu6qZYYuFL+sZoioKQqClUPDzsT7+MJlc3DGetjvtr3Ooe4XfT8dgNTXiFKHC5ghLz afkOiz6H5GsO9Gb7zJdp0KQI4AZP/cz4VzmWWiY333BeixlgZomK6w8Zwc0RFbSq6xO9 LqHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIrK/uJhste7tjnXivurtaS1zA8UCAVjOyuLK6FR4NR4m/AKTqp4sQycLJO4Rtn1iF1iSALmIpOsvOa1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.50.98 with SMTP id b2mr10351662oeo.38.1460390663010; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.7.194 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:04:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <570BC881.8000203@zend.com> References: <570BC881.8000203@zend.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:04:22 +0800 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: Xinchen Hui , Nikita Popov , Bob Weinand , Joe Watkins , internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1e276b3c1c9053037b205 Subject: Re: Object getter method optimization From: cornelius.howl@gmail.com (Lin Yo-An) --001a11c1e276b3c1c9053037b205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > > > We consider, possibility of moving the whole Optimizer into Zend, but it > won't change a lot, because expensive optimization make sense only with > opcache (when script is optimized once and executed many times). > Do you (or the team?) prefer to keep the JIT implementation as an extension or integrate the JIT implementation into the Zend core? Thanks, Yo-An --001a11c1e276b3c1c9053037b205--