Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:92106 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70198 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2016 14:32:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Apr 2016 14:32:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cornelius.howl@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cornelius.howl@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.51 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cornelius.howl@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.51 mail-oi0-f51.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.51] ([209.85.218.51:35494] helo=mail-oi0-f51.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 15/F7-27948-49CC3075 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:32:53 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id p188so19561572oih.2 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:32:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=DHV3RX2PRgKS2dyu+Andfw2M/jrfPJhYbnb7FV1fgaQ=; b=ktf36XhcDmPcbLvJ54jQzFKTnqgQ/wT6Egyxu6EHqAvp9DyMDuLgYoC2zRtZr8apsJ 0koIuZtLmiiD16OGG7TzRp7PJvrJmw5dekSSd0J8BGgSM2Le86sccp+0mGPiqDW8+MEj 2vQ+pulhO7DAYm7Wb/6J+hAiNKhOyxqfbRkWqud4rQ0NisVuqhZcut+9UEZmNW/bRTqg WfIhs2d4t8d6RymiBuY5La3+ncRwJwykzI1hnSbCCFBeaygFAWwIN6KBCm4JcYWm9oaB woLpphgCYkxu1qDA5Mzkj4Z475GYuVBa07lEMuQx3jV3GYvvmiqKSlp6qdwwnIpNY+Ss JHfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=DHV3RX2PRgKS2dyu+Andfw2M/jrfPJhYbnb7FV1fgaQ=; b=Lm0yQsSOWnp5I3FjgPE4+96yIbb7M6cOG2+1NTBzXplrZ00bdsXR6qbadTn+X/6lxB +jR2EBFE0Jg2CZ1bavuS+gOtnzmC+bTYAAorKqipCSGs0u6w5HYHlQPvO5tQwcI+ZK4j ri8xGeRc3PQwD741CntLvi7sxH4Lr2+wbb36ZIjN/+u+n+GhlqlNJewdYg8yfZVSEalf Rv0q4A0Rsj8yosnKxOHwGyf9Qsl99stZdQNBLgDZ4P8Hk+SzAWSs1FOU5HkaAfV0icRp WsCZv8G9JFMLGQtiu47+AqF60EgKdaR/8v2IELcdAq0adJtVi3JPrhBXD7RvL856Oqs8 MAgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ0HkwS0evjnRDskw5WTlmCKJRT9F1ix2hmKjVQJGkYlgQ0C5mVIpa+Ck7/qJUYY7I4sCg2Gig3QKJaVA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.157.49.57 with SMTP id e54mr9341531otc.97.1459866770346; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.7.194 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:32:50 +0800 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: Xinchen Hui , Nikita Popov , Bob Weinand , Joe Watkins , internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113e404244195f052fbdb85c Subject: Re: Object getter method optimization From: cornelius.howl@gmail.com (Lin Yo-An) --001a113e404244195f052fbdb85c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > I think, op_array->type and op_array->fn_flags can't be reused. > > Also, usage of op_array->run_time_cache is safer (I remember, I saw some > SIGSEGV with your patch and opcache.protect_memory=1) > Got it. Does run_time_cache vary when caller is different? maybe I can use the first 2 bytes for the accessor information. Cheers, Yo-An --001a113e404244195f052fbdb85c--