Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:9205 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56223 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Apr 2004 18:14:14 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55788 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 18:14:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.zend.com) (192.117.235.230) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 18:14:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 8450 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 18:14:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO AndiNotebook.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 18:14:05 -0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20040415211259.02f15ea8@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: andi@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:14:00 +0300 To: Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg Cc: georg@mysql.com,internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20040415202701.01d6b5f0@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.2.20040415202701.01d6b5f0@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/mysqli mysqli.c From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) At 02:09 PM 4/15/2004 -0400, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote: >On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > I held RC2 because I thought this was a critical engine bug. It happened > > because instead of not implementing NULL you implemented it without a body. > > Right now I changed it to NULL which means that any clone either via > > "clone" or compatibility_mode will result in an error message that MySQLi > > is not cloneable (no crash anymore). > > Should I go ahead with RC2 right now or can you fix this in the very near > > future? > >FYI: the MySQL Conference started yesterday. I don't know if Georg is >there, but it may be busy if he is. Personally, I think we can roll RC2 with the way the tree is now. The fact that MySQLi isn't cloneable isn't a big deal because: a) It's a new PHP 5 feature which is most likely not run in zend.zend1_compatibility_mode b) If explicit "clone" isn't supported, that's fine. An extension doesn't have to be cloneable. Andi