Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:91992
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pthreads.org from 209.85.161.177 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0201MB17863E4B9D9F53151A900DCDBF870@CY1PR0201MB1786.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABDNdAHwgx+LJRc_gi9citiypxxWVGFMB+6hrmU+vVYDWCDV_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1458149992.3969.2.camel@kuechenschabe>
	<BLU436-SMTP1394648F9BABA2FA74BFC4DE28A0@phx.gbl>
	<1458151531.3969.8.camel@kuechenschabe>
	<BLU436-SMTP2092DD6AFBC93D83397A3C7E28A0@phx.gbl>
	<1458153695.3969.16.camel@kuechenschabe>
	<3F.70.02405.6803BE65@pb1.pair.com>
	<56F01545.8080008@gmail.com>
	<CAF+90c-Z82kBT18ivvKejD5_dBf=dtbNYN-cZcyO1K=0C1WcLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<56F14572.701@gmail.com>
	<56F15EF5.80006@telia.com>
	<56F16023.1010002@gmail.com>
	<CAPhkiZxYwXKLp8ASkjiwXgzDtjKxJ8rYROCM-t=8sU5=efhg2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPhkiZwOJOkNu4N=h+wQRX4w8-KV=zg9x4khhLRLu199YcqZxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABDNdAGh4OjkkEQim6oYK=sZ=zj1Q==HzE=SLJ1E8=a=ku1DqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CY1PR0201MB17863E4B9D9F53151A900DCDBF870@CY1PR0201MB1786.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:18:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAL=_i_mNwmpg0PWmrm3nTZxn6s33u2QUzavk8w0Fk1OGvbWJtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: Phil Sturgeon <pjsturgeon@gmail.com>, "krakjoe@php.net" <krakjoe@php.net>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c086cd2feb787052f325f6f
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Discussion] Typed Properties
From: pthreads@pthreads.org (Joe Watkins)

--94eb2c086cd2feb787052f325f6f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Dmitry,

    The patch is pretty close to complete.

    When you start to dig a bit further, you'll notice that I prepared for
using cached pointers to prop info, but, I'm not sure how to allocate those
as the handlers are using the currently allocated slots so differently.

    I also patched opcache, but it's probably wrong (or not good enough,
not sure what to do about type_ce).

    Please do start working on the patch, that would be great ... I'll
leave it alone for you to do your thing :)

Cheers
Joe

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:

> Hi Phil, hi Joe,
>
> Is your patch complete?
>
> I took just a brief review yet, and I would like to make a deep check once
> again (and may be optimization).
> I saw, the patch makes some slowdown, but less than I expected.
> If you are not going to modify the patch in next two days, I would start
> working on it tomorrow.
>
> RFC itself looks fine.
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Phil Sturgeon <pjsturgeon@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 18:32
> To: Andrey Andreev
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Discussion] Typed Properties
>
> I'd like to thank everyone for their feedback on this RFC!
>
> It looks like the majority of concerns were solved during the course
> of this discussion, which is great news.
>
> The RFC has been expanded in a few areas to take care of a few other
> concerns, so please go and review it and let me know if you have any
> feedback.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/typed-properties
>
> Voting will start in a few days.
>
> Cheers,
> Phil
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>

--94eb2c086cd2feb787052f325f6f--