Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:91961 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54806 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2016 10:25:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Mar 2016 10:25:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.65 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.65 mail-vk0-f65.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.65] ([209.85.213.65:36841] helo=mail-vk0-f65.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 30/99-10214-48366F65 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 05:25:09 -0500 Received: by mail-vk0-f65.google.com with SMTP id z68so9896778vkg.3 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 03:25:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=5VC5436KzPlhk0fW2sfDfZSJciUkVjLBdyy9EgGb7NQ=; b=PaMcrD0/uPpIHi8HkEOcgLpNmrKI1KIGnTYe7trzHSyYxvH9Mc73Kl00mc8tn99THk ZqXh2zx4LjvDC4yOKzAJcqYmvx3MiwKx6yqqy4lhMbXeOEZmJLuqGqBv3L3aN43qgrqh mhAab7SbwVhiHW/K28qCyTlGdnrkruFfpwx6y5WSEP57R/wp02cnsFw1TGUpegJc79B4 mgj0Q2d/gpbcn1fM4QoC43kqOETmaqEFJMowxTXpLq+MqccOLY14CVbdW2PFw0E8Docv UhzMR7cborew943twMdvMbUW1rOaCVDRYYPMuQpLt50bB91DPSEQW6DHIzrRfVREAOOr 4aHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5VC5436KzPlhk0fW2sfDfZSJciUkVjLBdyy9EgGb7NQ=; b=RglzLO7xJG3ewuqsYcUpjqwKFAZLZdVtHUlqdE9GClvsx7jr1piRhXiQB+dPFo0+WS b/sSMxT/l9dvgPng+EgppwoUzk9Isd4RoeDAbGoowi/flnorAqnaGAKB2KNTzP62j4H9 pJseGcXkVODGLkvrg3IX8OusGebWbRYFoXpEcmOS0X/0zpKHvRnOLBZtrFs8t9499Hzr 6TLgcdwxmw1Sd15KldrRkoKRlNPwusTagpTF3Xi4W60b+fb3OW/yqCcMAFunW6PjzHxW urQRriy65mo1mHsvvFhZ0y1C9R7MVGr02WFowEgD/NraADqBOIClnADU0iMG0vdLjKfe NZzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIcGrMDy42/u3TIY+W56CTjU4cBkZbMrDgRI+LC77C0suu6fOVvd6HfzeVZ+ywN4A/Puk7jD9ve/fZaNg== X-Received: by 10.31.8.142 with SMTP id 136mr9671599vki.14.1458987905749; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 03:25:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.159.40.98 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 03:24:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:24:26 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xlx4-iEkkuxHlo8MYDAP4xcRuWM Message-ID: To: "internals@lists.php.net" Cc: Andrew Faulds , Dan Ackroyd , Anthony Ferrara , Levi Morrison , Nikita Popov , pajoye@php.net, peehaa@php.net, trowski@php.net, Ferenc Kovacs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [RFC][Discussion] Precise session data management From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) Hi, On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > Since the vote for > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/precise_session_management > is declined 15 vs 11. > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/precise_session_management#vote > > We have to come up with other solutions for > > - Session loss by race conditions > - Method to make session abuse harder > > These issues are serious issues that cannot be ignored. > Looking forward alternative implementation ideas! I would like to start reworking on this proposal. I need feedback the reason why vote against the RFC. Looking forward disclosure. Is splitting RFC up enough? Thanks. -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net