Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:91898 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13980 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2016 15:30:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2016 15:30:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=colinodell@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=colinodell@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: colinodell@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.179 mail-ob0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.179] ([209.85.214.179:33999] helo=mail-ob0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C2/8A-36618-20804F65 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:30:11 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id kf9so35067518obc.1 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IONXS2vRfQ1fu0dY0EyDE7Y0BdkXUqBWn1gZldsEh3Q=; b=XpWtMTSPmHSEMauA7RfjR1G+JrNcFRdx7oRPehSHiRHstpQT7+wu8LqAuQFeeTlhNP cqqnopPSkzmLW1kL/Msc64FPU+UjdtmSihd8WqixKHMPmdIS59II7JFwLmutT7qdun0c FFqtdb9PRWtFU2onQ/iZFH+TjOorO9pVIPk0gkqj6FoiKGDD8c1bEBKht+4gtU8hIvbR S5iOWD6S1EsTaS2DpjMEjw30jnePUI4mhxLevhStxIOI1rWEO41ffNA8YGDfqFa1vYH7 SWTHd6zPygRbaGAzCqQYKzXbqN7cfAYBLILI2WOnMD4VZzY4OeCsUlN2tn7CqcdE6hg3 CGoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IONXS2vRfQ1fu0dY0EyDE7Y0BdkXUqBWn1gZldsEh3Q=; b=kemyaDFhs4sF9kvlyOJhffNVd7ZkdfPPFrg5ZZuPfPhsE8R5Ww+m0Ypc94eZ7Fvd0m 0TAkoOn3lgANlQla9LK66MOBIyKvpjt18KJgtMb23RL0wpsdCvKTnVJy2lcw0ZFq1WFI Az+Zcepw0k0hLgU50obN8CDem3sL1TU+LI/XTCuFFmpu6q+18LnGLbv8ah4VIuRczX2c +87Ub+DcfCYQa7CzwH6g3pqqw1P9CbOKx3MxggBjpjfSmi1+1rzkPUJ/XMGmtShpIVRf g2peZUkxzQ0+ZTw17H+GUJQV7B2du5vmZZcg6Wc7XRi13/4rBwYSd3ejrWsNRlMUIais 7OwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIwbnt9eir1fijwIztEwox5cIxS4mj24wWz4xWER1HrkrlAdUGPDZzQCK55+x0OinAbAmyZFh73ic5+Xw== X-Received: by 10.182.33.166 with SMTP id s6mr4698023obi.30.1458833396036; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:29:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:29:46 +0000 Message-ID: To: Chris Riley , Scott Arciszewski Cc: Yasuo Ohgaki , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2de1c5b7cb5052ecd1e82 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discussion] Precise session data management From: colinodell@gmail.com ("Colin O'Dell") --001a11c2de1c5b7cb5052ecd1e82 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'm +1 for splitting it into smaller chunks. I didn't fully comprehend the impact of some aspects of the RFC and therefore didn't feel it was appropriate for me to cast a vote either way. However, if the different pieces were broken out into smaller, more-focused RFCs I would likely vote for most of them. Regards, Colin --001a11c2de1c5b7cb5052ecd1e82--