Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:9172 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70899 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Apr 2004 11:11:31 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70830 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 11:11:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jdi.jdimedia.nl) (212.204.192.51) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 11:11:31 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdimedia.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3FBBNst017365; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:11:23 +0200 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:10:56 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Per Jessen cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] what is the reasonable thing to with a segfault in php? From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Per Jessen wrote: > I'm *certain* it is caused by a mistake in *my* code, but I feel it isn't > exactly appropriate for php to segfault because of a user error? Right, it's not supposed to do so. Please make a backtrace of the segfault (with gdb), or try with valgrind to see what goes wrong. Derick