Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:91625 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46042 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2016 03:01:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Mar 2016 03:01:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.217.182 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.182 mail-lb0-f182.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.182] ([209.85.217.182:35881] helo=mail-lb0-f182.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6C/29-18364-02532E65 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 22:01:54 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x1so138295458lbj.3 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:01:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=golemon-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=qSDekn7mytd4OVwuDPxvBL/j6uEIECEPLkOzBqcjUKg=; b=0eXZhBC9Qj0wpS2J+CW4Cq8ht+Owva9lOTetjdr3yQuGb3NMERTUfh88N2aFtK8ZCh pAICuvXyKNDiQ6DLipUehJ8LSZqD6zcwv/R2JR/J6/cigkzwHfoIGY3yhhMzwE4bTW8s Q+T+H0FvaEvfAlu4se6rMk0XiV2v7IRdKKIkt2qFr7jG6BKG9ldPHKkU8m491PN0swtF DaAE4VA4Y1wNBg48A9/7ICzunI+MMTMWFa1+Wd3Z7P417eGnu6396+rkDpPJsk+2eC2E xAsFYNxQrKsSZ6z8zlku7577fINZfzf2EEC0bEYVaWkvPKRejm+eG8JmMtfT0VkaWEZ3 wK4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=qSDekn7mytd4OVwuDPxvBL/j6uEIECEPLkOzBqcjUKg=; b=ZXfpVJWQtJOkX8NlEv8ulM9hbPxk4WqWUrClj2C2zMA0QVOgRIcVDnL42AlLHzKXuY OP4ozqLOobjq5OZAcuUN588tvX6GKWMSr1VV5OmrPsc1mOfAtPP1pnD9DVK7O6IUmVqX kg5O78Q0TnApDCh3VF27weCjsd3tS2okkeIBgVzjSDnE7IgMbYv25xvgUZpKPxZ1GY5F brOK4ua0kWbONqcYuW1axATktISwdBTtBn9K5vVcThbiHW3jC6fbhuSkwC5P+Dfh/R0G tjn2YxvJqIo0Ehnk/xECy+3uhU4f1082x4Fs9h4m0Vg8UBakKaoQGOZwEB3XaxrMPX8f uYYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIOwJQYQdENCWXqH62wi897s/G6l75ERNnxEXD6e7QMyheO+0Gnt3dbCID4uMx+WVc0cjruAWQI4MNGQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.188.134 with SMTP id ga6mr2404697lbc.77.1457665308631; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:01:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: php@golemon.com Received: by 10.112.18.75 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:01:48 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [107.198.91.68] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:01:48 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NDyZgwWFLVAkb79HSUQVfFQxVjY Message-ID: To: Midori Kocak Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Proposal] Null Coalesce Equal Operator From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Midori Kocak wrote: > Let me introduce my first RFC here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/null_coalesce_equal_operator > > I've jumped on the bandwagon by adding a second RFC related to this one: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short_ternary_equal_operator which focused on the short-ternary operator with the same goal of creating and assignment version of the operation. We can probably discuss them as a single concept since they relate to the same underlying principle (consistency in binary operations in the language), but I made it a separate RFC in case we want different voting or have different concerns regarding them. If that's a terrible idea, I can close the new one and let Midori add ?: to her original RFC. -Sara