Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:91581 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57146 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2016 11:48:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Mar 2016 11:48:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:48586] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C1/A0-53667-67D00E65 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 06:48:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF8110C01C; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 11:48:03 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 11:48:03 +0000 (GMT) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Yasuo Ohgaki cc: "internals@lists.php.net" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Precise session management From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > Hi all, > > This mail is for RFC vote notice. > > The RFC is > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/precise_session_management > The PR is > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1734 > > I suppose almost all questions and discussion is finished, but > if you have any, please comment/ask. > > Vote starts 2016-03-09-09:00(UTC) and ends 2016-03-23-09:00(UTC) > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/precise_session_management#vote > > Please note that I set 2/3 of supporters is required to pass even if it > is not strictly required. Please let us know the reason why if one > would like to vote against this RFC. Thank you. Voted for, but I have added some comments to the PR. cheers, Derick