Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:91164
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL=_i_=NHKshbG17uJ_S9A=qeJiYLtq0fuKOjWPqoYJHS4bveg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <38.31.07203.2EB94B65@pb1.pair.com> <8E.1A.36326.338F8B65@pb1.pair.com>
 <CAL=_i_=NHKshbG17uJ_S9A=qeJiYLtq0fuKOjWPqoYJHS4bveg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:36:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFp73Xs4X-god_+ZVsEX9PecmRhwZUuH1Q_D8m7nsjB36ama3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>
Cc: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a7f7816b5d0052b581521
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] Allow specifying keys in list()
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

--047d7b3a7f7816b5d0052b581521
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Here is my reasons for no:

1- Non-intuitive behavior
2- Hard to read code, takes more time to understand underlying logic/flow
3- YAANPI => Yet Another Alternate Named Parameters Implementation (when I
look at future scope)
4- Most common usage form (first example) still forces you to type almost
same amount of logic with less readability and little value

Regards,

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org> wrote:

> Morning internalz,
>
>     As mentioned the future scope stuff is scary, but not enough on it's
> own to vote no.
>
>     So I want to vote yes, but I'm just waiting to hear objections from no
> voters, in case they thought of something I didn't ...
>
> Cheers
> Joe
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > There's been a lot of No votes on this RFC, but I haven't received much
> > feedback as to why. Would any of you mind sharing your reasons, if
> > possible? It would be helpful if I knew why people have voted against it,
> > as then I might be able to modify the RFC to be more palatable, or
> > understand where I went wrong.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > Andrea Faulds wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> It's been more than two weeks since I first proposed this RFC, and
> >> there's no outstanding issues preventing moving towards a vote. There's
> >> not yet a language specification patch, but that can be done later.
> >>
> >> So, I'm opening the vote on this RFC today, 2016-02-05, and it'll close
> >> the Sunday after next, 2016-02-14. The vote requires a 2/3 majority as
> >> it's a language change.
> >>
> >> The RFC page is here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/list_keys
> >>
> >> Happy voting!
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrea Faulds
> > https://ajf.me/
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>



-- 
Guilherme Blanco
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
GTalk: guilhermeblanco
Toronto - ON/Canada

--047d7b3a7f7816b5d0052b581521--