Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90946 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67648 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2016 22:31:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Jan 2016 22:31:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=me@rouvenwessling.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=me@rouvenwessling.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain rouvenwessling.de from 80.241.60.215 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: me@rouvenwessling.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.241.60.215 mx2.mailbox.org Received: from [80.241.60.215] ([80.241.60.215:47205] helo=mx2.mailbox.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 59/81-56702-4A3F7A65 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:31:01 -0500 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE8142082 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:30:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by gerste.heinlein-support.de (gerste.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.173]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id Y0qnL53XhqS0 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:30:56 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:30:55 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: To: Internals X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Deprecate mb_ereg_replace eval option From: me@rouvenwessling.de (=?utf-8?Q?Rouven_We=C3=9Fling?=) > On 04 Jan 2016, at 17:46, Rouven We=C3=9Fling = wrote: >=20 > I=E2=80=99d like to propose the following RFC to you = https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate_mb_ereg_replace_eval_option There hasn=E2=80=99t been any discussion on this for a while. Just to to = be sure it didn=E2=80=99t just got forgotten due to the CoC discussion, = let me remind you of it ;) If there are no concerns brought up, I=E2=80=99ll open the vote = tomorrow. Best regards Rouven=