Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90939 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33001 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2016 15:01:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Jan 2016 15:01:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=codekestrel@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=codekestrel@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: codekestrel@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.47 mail-wm0-f47.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.47] ([74.125.82.47:37508] helo=mail-wm0-f47.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C7/77-10534-F4A87A65 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:01:35 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n5so134911810wmn.0 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:01:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=voLb3+BxggZSyDx2/jmDsf63UFja2sUNr7P+KX3t42o=; b=mxGVjYjTTuiqCib9ubub42guDFb7zmmaaNr1xoZwr5uyqwk3ifJEh4+s05J8a32sLx AGI40807D434mqDdTcADctsA7uGQ6nfFKTqjbqLbqn6ItiTZOVEpAsh55p9B9qr6l6Ef sUdQuh+4hOC/ASI/ILdiOuSADKya9tiiKtyrf9RQOVVWdUWilEZjPsazwX01SoDtiUna njwgQ9gYroPUwwc0JgYRX/iwirUfC4aS1DPa7Tlpj1il7Ppc1N03BAMKosind92FuWIK hhERuqptdzm1fuqv9MNRyPnTIY41ETPFiU/3F8xzDFJesoo1ECffc+BQo4zsPunCWRq7 0VzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=voLb3+BxggZSyDx2/jmDsf63UFja2sUNr7P+KX3t42o=; b=VS4npf6Q7aG+S3MjsFD2Eb1RSYygF964lsWKtDIoC924WXHjgdVStWdtu6r45coljk n1p5y9ez35Zt/Q58urE10EMAgIvvKGRNX+EIVLMYr/6dsGNrSa1xOyyJ4sMTpd9PofuQ hpOirUbE6x/nhA7J8H99IjTNfJqgS5h2Vz7j0wGM8Jif2zoFNpWJNTscyw8iJyZsyFww 6IO7UTcp2XirNraVVqzAyNxExIhYBMLszUt/Zr0ueL4cIwFEhtUhUGxPttRnMoNKMlnf L2aYDqNRj73JWu1fhDxr2BftwbiNv3vkDjxdIVLLg8ttK27mq3CNFr/8SJfSmP+WlH3P qWNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTBJnOKyw8hB6rH3DIHSQt10R6VZaVeR5pBJO9cTxzhafeusHbtMYf4GF5mVPKW6tPueJODOYChNvWiOg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.189.11 with SMTP id n11mr25937889wmf.3.1453820492343; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:01:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.175.225 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:01:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.175.225 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:01:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:01:32 +0000 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b15dc0379b3052a3df6d0 Subject: Regarding type argument syntax From: codekestrel@googlemail.com (Dominic Grostate) --001a114b15dc0379b3052a3df6d0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello all, This concerns the RFC on generics. It isn't an extension to the proposal, a sale or anything, just hypothetical, it only regards a technicality about its implementation of syntax. The issue is the T_SR >> for nested type arguments. I understand the reason this is difficult, and I know resolving it may involve hacking the lexer. So all I want to know is **IF** the RFC was accepted, what action would be acceptable to internals to make it work? Thanks, Dominic --001a114b15dc0379b3052a3df6d0--