Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90900
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.43 as permitted sender)
To: amacgregor@allanmacgregor.com
References: <023119E29B154072B09D82ED35C29C36@sharonc67d61d6>
 <56A573C2.4070202@allanmacgregor.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <56A5AD0E.3060701@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:05:18 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56A573C2.4070202@allanmacgregor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

Hi!

> Now, if we are still adamant on coming up with a CoC first I would like
> to put forward the following 3 documents as alternatives for the
> Contributor Covenant:
> 
> 
> [A contribution policy for open source that
> works](https://medium.com/@jmaynard/a-contribution-policy-for-open-source-that-works-bfc4600c9d83#.d53666v7u)

This one deals with code contributions, but our discussion is wider. In
fact, we never, as far as I could remember, had code contribution which
was per se controversial. We did have ones that were controversial in
that we disagreed on whether or not that code is doing what we actually
want to do, but the code usually is not a problem.

> 
> [The Code of
> Merit](https://github.com/rosarior/Code-of-Merit/blob/master/CODE_OF_MERIT.md)

I don't particularly like this approach, it sounds too defensive.

> [The Pragmatists Code of
> Conduct](https://github.com/amacgregor/Pragmatists-Code-of-Conduct/blob/master/Prag-Code-of-Conduct.md)


This one basically can be TLDRed as "behave as an adult". Which is nice
if we were to agree what it means, but that is in no way automatic, thus
I am afraid it is not enough :) Assuming good faith is a nice touch
though, I like it.
-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com