Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90896 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60733 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2016 23:36:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jan 2016 23:36:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=slevy1@pipeline.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=slevy1@pipeline.com; sender-id=unknown; domainkeys=good Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pipeline.com from 209.86.89.70 cause and error) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: slevy1@pipeline.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.86.89.70 elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [209.86.89.70] ([209.86.89.70:42021] helo=elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EA/E2-42451-BEF55A65 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:36:11 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=pipeline.com; b=C7JnogEl+8rgAn7K4fchb+xIbIZA0LlhPzWXxC0kCF4DfK+Bq67r0LpjPB8P0CN4; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [108.215.225.25] (helo=sharonc67d61d6) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1aNUCM-0000KQ-JP; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:35:58 -0500 Message-ID: <023119E29B154072B09D82ED35C29C36@sharonc67d61d6> To: Cc: "\"PHP internals\"" Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:36:26 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-ELNK-Trace: ad108fc9e0b7e924cd4e711cd2c366965f08d759999b566291ea0379fdd696c0d442a14b067b44c6350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 108.215.225.25 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct From: slevy1@pipeline.com ("Sharon Levy") Or, is the purpose of the CoC really a device to control perceptions, i.e. protect the image of the PHP project and its citizens? >>Well, that would also be a benefit. I don't think these are exclusive >>goals. If PHP isn't inviting, people won't want to contribute. What I fear is that if the citizenry of Userland and PHPland do not feel at liberty to publicly and freely express their criticism of the PHP project, then important feedback will not be forthcoming, feedback that could aid in advancing PHP. Also, if taking personal responsibility for one's communication style seems like an unworthy value to subscribe to, then it seems that a BDFL might be in order. My own unsolicited 0.02 is that their should be a brief lexicon of expressions that are deemed inappropriate for discussion along with *suggested* substitutions. Those who feel only comfortable with rigid rules underestimate the power that freedom affords to the creative process. So, is this CoC really about attracting new thoughts or is it about making the status quo an even more comfortable place for those who count as part of the meritocracy? ^Z