Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90894 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55820 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2016 22:48:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jan 2016 22:48:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.160.176 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.176 mail-yk0-f176.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.176] ([209.85.160.176:33529] helo=mail-yk0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FF/02-42451-8A455A65 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 17:48:09 -0500 Received: by mail-yk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id k129so143888482yke.0 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:48:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rWYCAsrQPdpfobpi7+9bdTEphaViVAD1CmPfK9mqzfs=; b=thGKIfEAcRiv2+TQtiJRdE0UTnK3M5/OzxVYLMA6rrchM4ZYgaFO1IWwWW/rPmzUQF p8fzKqxiJNz6yqgShMKZIOeejgSinHSVQeWxZE9K0VfLuJ7j420zGqdpEmZGK9g8U5io EzTxqFKGN83TjenIoG/uherzQNXT8C3/pt3M3lfFewmquzAuwqJi7FXRL+xMdVrhinEY butW8BU4Zq12hz7z7ybsVX48CDoUe2nkHVbhmv2hBYyD0W2xIbSxH184m7J1C9vWiakJ LMLNfTaTsYggcePTM7QzRdkvuu8Q64CtiD8JbtjggacHoBFscoPUNqR99EBONpt3ngsg t+RQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rWYCAsrQPdpfobpi7+9bdTEphaViVAD1CmPfK9mqzfs=; b=kXpks/j+8SM52uJLoF0JTmQMeMS5xuGkVn+IuHKlEuy2bWjSqXr2FWe+CaGAiV7CKs 7O1CqfPHbL4BB0Mir+46clSxARsl+G2J0vr3yx8SqOmee1yZtgvNWwLJYS7XYzKaP0AE N0ZMbjbJ4pwjts3g5W2o9gsZIu4wKk5p2IzE6TCtq9dBLQXcJAB4AHJCmwkuXsC972nc sPQFMjpazrOOm2ntO6+PpmMs0uPVhxA9UTLRlqeb12Ki7me3Np/eGjMgef8nMPGBwz2M EjmJN8Ou9NlQhst6g2599II2ONPIqWLXbmLAEFKbUsZe/uAAqrhkORFIeocxcgfHLrHu 2Eww== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSF5ShOHl66eQsJyCHG1r3tvaXYoX9HfK2Pi6DTB48apkKWI/t/fDuG/vkPzIXlGH+WMiGPR+Y2EHrJcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.2.84 with SMTP id 81mr5119265ybc.15.1453675686112; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:48:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.83.131 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:48:05 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [78.147.7.95] In-Reply-To: <56A533BC.3060003@gmail.com> References: <56A3F0FA.1050609@mprelu.de> <56A533BC.3060003@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:48:05 +0000 Message-ID: To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On 24 January 2016 at 20:27, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > if people here agree it's a good direction You've watered down the text about bad behaviour in general and in particular the bits explicitly listing bad behaviour surrounding discussion of RFCs; I do not like that direction. A significant number of technical RFC discussions have been less productive than they should be, due to people repeatedly sending emails against an RFC, that repeat what they have already said, which is not a productive use of anyone's time, and makes people (including myself) not want to put forward ideas, or to participate in the discussions. Also, you probably ought to put your own name as the author names on a document when making large changes, instead of leaving other people's at the top. cheers Dan