Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90880 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 3102 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2016 11:53:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jan 2016 11:53:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mark@lange.demon.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mark@lange.demon.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lange.demon.co.uk from 91.221.169.46 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mark@lange.demon.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.221.169.46 mdfmta005.mxout.tch.inty.net Received: from [91.221.169.46] ([91.221.169.46:52216] helo=smtp.demon.co.uk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7B/62-16574-F4BB4A65 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 06:53:52 -0500 Received: from mdfmta005.tch.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta005.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A86B18CD89 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:53:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mdfmta005.tch.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta005.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6606E18CD5C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:53:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (unknown [109.148.28.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mdfmta005.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:53:47 +0000 (GMT) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <56A25C2D.3060903@anderiasch.de> <56.3B.03822.C8854A65@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: <56A4BB54.9000000@lange.demon.co.uk> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:53:56 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56.3B.03822.C8854A65@pb1.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MDF-HostID: 18 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct From: mark@lange.demon.co.uk (Mark Baker) On 24/01/2016 04:52, Andrea Faulds wrote: > The Go one looks pretty great to me. It might not be such a bad idea > if we were to adopt it almost verbatim. > > I also don't think we need to write anything new. Other people have > done that legwork for us, we are wasting our time if we try to create > something new. PHP is not radically different from other open-source > projects. > > Go's one is not excessively long, gets to the point, and is > reasonable. It appears to cover everything we need: positive values, > what is unacceptable, a statement of why moderation is needed, and how > to report issue and how it will be handled. The structure of the Go CoC is good.... starting with explaining why have one, and with the positive values emphasised before it gets into the what is unwelcome behaviour and what to do about it.... the emphasis is still on mediation, but it looks more positive from an outsiders perspective. While the wording could be a bit different in places, the overall structure promotes the benefits and I'd like to see something similar for PHP. As one of those outsiders looking in, and occasionally considering contributing more, seeing something like that would make me feel a lot more comfortable about being more proactive -- Mark Baker _________ |. \ \-3 |_J_/ PHP | || | __ | || |m| |m| I LOVE PHP