Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90872 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78702 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2016 05:37:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jan 2016 05:37:37 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 176.248.2.57 unknown Received: from [176.248.2.57] ([176.248.2.57:8736] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EC/4C-03822-02364A65 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 00:37:36 -0500 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net References: <56A3F0FA.1050609@mprelu.de> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 05:37:32 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 176.248.2.57 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) Hi Zeev, Zeev Suraski wrote: > One thing which isn't clear to me is whether this: > "If you conduct yourself in a way that is explicitly forbidden by the CoC, you will be warned and asked to stop. If you do not stop, you will be removed from our community spaces temporarily. Repeated, wilful breaches of the CoC will result in a permanent ban." > ... applies to reports, or only to proactive moderation. In other words, whether the response to a report - anonymous or otherwise - can only result in a warning the first time around? Can one only get permabanned after numerous temporary bans and repeated 'offenses'? I don't think it specifically applies to reports or moderation, but rather to what it says: "repeated, wilfull breaches". If the team is aware that you've done something multiple times, then it's going to be more harsh on you. I don't think whether each of those times was reported separately, if at all, would mean anything. Anyway, as to how many warnings people would get, and how quickly they would be banned, if at all, would surely vary from case to case with severity. We should assume whoever enforces this is somewhat reasonable. > Last - does anybody know whether this CoC ever got 'battle tested' thus far? This is a question I'm wondering about as well. It all seems pretty good, but I wonder if, for example, the lists of unwelcome behaviour and discrimination characteristics are sufficiently complete. Thanks. -- Andrea Faulds https://ajf.me/