Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90836 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26131 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2016 16:56:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jan 2016 16:56:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:55329] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 79/96-12955-F2F52A65 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:56:16 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 504F2E20F0; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:56:12 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:56:12 +0000 (GMT) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Florian Anderiasch cc: Pierre Joye , PHP internals In-Reply-To: <56A25C2D.3060903@anderiasch.de> Message-ID: References: <56A25C2D.3060903@anderiasch.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, Florian Anderiasch wrote: > On 22.01.2016 15:29, Pierre Joye wrote: > > > > Freshly adopted: > > > > http://rubyonrails.org/conduct/ > > https://golang.org/conduct > > > > Ruby (the language) is discussing the adoption of a Code of Conduct > right now, and several people in that thread issue what I think are > similar concerns about the wording in the covenant one: > > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004 > > AFAICT Rails adopted exactly that one, not sure about slight changes. > > FWIW, I like the Go one a lot better. I do too. I think there is a lot we can borrow from that. I'll probably use the weekend to draft the first bit of my suggested process: THe values document. Expect things from other "codes" to come back into it. cheers, Derick