Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90800 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81617 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2016 16:53:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jan 2016 16:53:58 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 178.62.40.5 ajf.me Received: from [178.62.40.5] ([178.62.40.5:24620] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/AE-09073-52D01A65 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:53:57 -0500 Message-ID: <5E.AE.09073.52D01A65@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net References: <43.8B.22511.75120A65@pb1.pair.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:53:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 178.62.40.5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) Dan, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > On 21 January 2016 at 07:06, Zeev Suraski wrote: >> We have clear rules which disallow revival of RFCs which failed a vote for a duration of six months, unless they're very substantially modified, so revival isn't always allowed in open source. > > > As other people have noted, the RFC never went to vote, so it was > never rejected. > > But even if it had been, the actual text is you're claiming as a clear rule is: > > "it will not be allowed to bring up a rejected proposal up for another > vote, unless...The author(s) make substantial changes to the > proposal." > > There is absolutely no rule against being allowed to discuss > something. The only rule is about putting stuff to a vote repeatedly. This is true, but Ze'ev acknowledged that already. -- Andrea Faulds https://ajf.me/