Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90771 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24019 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2016 14:21:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jan 2016 14:21:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:46946] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A3/03-09073-A59E0A65 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:21:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6536BE20F0; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:45:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:45:01 +0000 (GMT) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pavel_Kou=C5=99il?= cc: PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323329-366905657-1453373101=:3314" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323329-366905657-1453373101=:3314 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Pavel Kou=C5=99il wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Derick Rethans = wrote: > > > > I've decided to re-propose the CoC RFC. There are many reasons for=20 > > it, but there are a few points I want to make. >=20 > if you still insists on some CoC, maybe you could at least look into=20 > something else than the "Contributor Covenant"? >=20 > For example, http://code-of-merit.org/ seems much more reasonable in=20 > "getting the things done" than the Covenant. I had a look at this, and I think it is not suitable. It is almost the=20 exact opposite of promoting collaborative behaviour, and instead only=20 focusses on the "if you done nothing before, you have no voice". There=20 is also no chance the PHP project will have have a benevolent dictator=20 (or group of people). And it only focusses on the technical aspects of a=20 community, but even covering a set of guidelines to improve=20 collaboration. cheers, Derick --8323329-366905657-1453373101=:3314--