Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90770 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19250 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2016 14:01:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jan 2016 14:01:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=padraic.brady@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=padraic.brady@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: padraic.brady@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.49 mail-wm0-f49.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.49] ([74.125.82.49:37219] helo=mail-wm0-f49.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id ED/22-09073-4B4E0A65 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:01:25 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n5so82288948wmn.0 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 06:01:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ejne1Voe94QVBj3WdkkJaWSCELLEQc+zosu6eWZ8jrw=; b=tTlpcBOxUL1JRV+BIEA8uf+5N6qxWEpY2QZvlFwGKVJVGy5Q1KkKNy6nJZBKRR/Mwm lVZy0agtyL36VqUpR9TVFS+DVOvXphnyWua/OeVCkGxa5qO9C88TnzvoISYPJlnrHGrM 8QVO9iv04nNiaul5kbHX/eMblDTAFqEtvDsm2ZcBNpJ6FBM7yA8KUY+hllJpaY4SdyAY R0KhvLXOrCcstPXSeiesF93M1XhBa7qJV9+kV03ZduZ708zPNYK1opTT1rWmoN4v6Wuu 0W+xmEXtgCKO1ivU2Djphvxo+v8RX5G24pPxSIDpYu0SXlfuNw+RfUwixFjLHyFwaSxa h0kA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ejne1Voe94QVBj3WdkkJaWSCELLEQc+zosu6eWZ8jrw=; b=ghwONncRPTKWU3wAEGLGTvIpI7ngMsoqZraACnkk67xDpmJvgmB4uruohkAabChuDi aPoraUrk43jP1/T4Mzp6OO75ffXLgj5voFSrOyQH2V89zi8pgzqKr/yqE2RXsu1MOY/0 mo9jySK4X8YdLtAwsilM3wsyyFK3/1HoUPvqw02rYsn8BISvyURQl2EeEAcygrR86qzm gXoXCTAkMyZAaKy6mBybPr2nBDFjQ2vNx8zWp1nJK9g8PT69a7YppeReBLJ20MqM8B75 QTXJbIDIan6ESMxgLwQ80Ew1MSubNGjVU9/hQn34ypVvo1D930v0TE4NRk/cWPXd371+ xUjg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn24OA6eFcGlkrL+iqj3EeQFB9xS1fYeRygz7SMlGXVDie0Q3u0CTUYom3PpriIrP6R9SjzA1k8o48vhIFcmygNeq+bvQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.20.67 with SMTP id l3mr39467070wje.86.1453378789752; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:19:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.152.212 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:19:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45CA8C41-4C0A-418C-925D-4B147ECBF297@gohearsay.com> References: <45CA8C41-4C0A-418C-925D-4B147ECBF297@gohearsay.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:19:49 +0000 Message-ID: To: Kevin Smith Cc: Derick Rethans , =?UTF-8?Q?Pavel_Kou=C5=99il?= , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct From: padraic.brady@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draic_Brady?=) Hi, On 21 January 2016 at 04:37, Kevin Smith wrote: > I noticed you were contacted by Randi Lee Harper [https://archive.is/b8RD= W], the ironically abusive founder of the Online Abuse Prevention Initiativ= e [https://archive.is/eqco9][http://archive.is/A1Azz] known for attacking a= nd attempting to eject from projects/employment people she associates with = groups she doesn=E2=80=99t approve of [http://archive.is/1A8SQ], wherein sh= e suggested that you ignore the Code of Merit that Pavel recommended for co= nsideration because she associates the author of said code with a group tha= t=E2=80=94though entirely unrelated to his Open Source contributions=E2=80= =94she finds undesirable and then proceeded to make general derogatory comm= ents about him [again, https://archive.is/b8RDW]. Are you here to debate the proposed COC, or to mount personal attacks on someone outside of the PHP community? > (My deepest apologies for such a tremendous run-on sentence.) > > I certainly hope this isn=E2=80=99t indicative of the spirit of this prop= osal. This exchange really seems to suggest the goal of these codes in gene= ral, and now possibly this one in particular, is what so many of us have fe= ared: to exclude people with wrong ideas and associations, as defined by th= e in-group. Is that what the RFC actually states though? As it's a code of conduct, it's directed at specific actions not whatever is running through your, or my, head. Paddy