Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90702 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12693 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2016 16:49:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jan 2016 16:49:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain telia.com from 81.236.60.155 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.236.60.155 v-smtpout2.han.skanova.net Received: from [81.236.60.155] ([81.236.60.155:45116] helo=v-smtpout2.han.skanova.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BC/7C-20254-7971D965 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:49:29 -0500 Received: from [192.168.8.9] ([94.254.95.82]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id LCzbaPUCNQIOwLCzcaQdcG; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:49:24 +0100 To: Lester Caine References: <569CD913.8070102@lsces.co.uk> Cc: PHP internals Message-ID: <569D1795.8000308@telia.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:49:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <569CD913.8070102@lsces.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfKgHmH1fV6nR7B5uxwiRcaR6u5rp++mWyPWvCKzqxCb3IEag7jJwRTatPYdnoLmpfHCO0Rz35PPLJ1P2wUui+CjnX2hZBcRT3umNdAAiLCfolXBrGuoV Av3qTbYI6oMjQan1RTAnPuYlNGimcEyAlYubK4lULmhir+bExELzaj1/ksqQ1NMAtR9TfuIGSwYzIQ5I3VL9UOWgj114sodlKWg= Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] Number Format Separator From: bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Larsson?=) Den 2016-01-18 kl. 13:22, skrev Lester Caine: > On 18/01/16 08:12, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: >> Large numeric literals are not used often. However if it is used, it's >> frustrating to read. e.g. Code audit/review. Why not make computer >> do the job? >> >> I hope more people change their mind. > Where large numbers are used, adding them as strings using the local > format is already used? This just adds yet another 'option' to how they > can be entered but is something which makes reading in the context of > the local use MORE of a problem? My main need would be hexadecimal code > which is not covered, so I still need the alternate hacks anyway. > Hm... I got the impression it was covered by reading the two last examples of: "Enable for arbitrary grouping of digits". Did I read it to quick? r//Björn