Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:90693 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 84244 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2016 12:22:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jan 2016 12:22:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.204 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.204] ([217.147.176.204:51003] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D6/38-20254-619DC965 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:22:47 -0500 Received: (qmail 2994 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jan 2016 12:22:43 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 2988, pid: 2991, t: 0.0713s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.7?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 18 Jan 2016 12:22:43 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Message-ID: <569CD913.8070102@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:22:43 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] Number Format Separator From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 18/01/16 08:12, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > Large numeric literals are not used often. However if it is used, it's > frustrating to read. e.g. Code audit/review. Why not make computer > do the job? > > I hope more people change their mind. Where large numbers are used, adding them as strings using the local format is already used? This just adds yet another 'option' to how they can be entered but is something which makes reading in the context of the local use MORE of a problem? My main need would be hexadecimal code which is not covered, so I still need the alternate hacks anyway. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk